- From: Sailesh Panchang <sailesh.panchang@deque.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 16:04:41 -0400
- To: "'Ryan Doherty'" <rdoherty@mozilla.com>, <wai-xtech@w3.org>
Right indeed. I was confused when I saw multiple 'navigation' roles on mail.yahoo.com too and realized there was no way available as per the ARIA specs. To distinguish one from the other. Sets of links that might be 'secondary' or 'footer' cannot really be termed complementary. But maybe that is the best option in the circumstances. Sailesh Panchang Accessibility Services Manager (Web and Software) Deque Systems Inc. (www.deque.com) 11130 Sunrise Valley Drive, Suite #140, Reston VA 20191 Phone: 703-225-0380 (ext 105) E-mail: sailesh.panchang@deque.com -----Original Message----- From: wai-xtech-request@w3.org [mailto:wai-xtech-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Doherty Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 5:08 PM To: wai-xtech@w3.org Subject: ARIA semantics for secondary navigation label secondary navigation elements that are frequently used throughout the site. Example: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/firefox.html (Products / Firefox menu) Technically this is navigation, but I will be adding the landmark 'navigation' to the top nav, and I don't think it's a good idea to re- use the landmark. I'm not sure it can be considered 'complimentary', can it? Would it remain meaningful if it was separated from the main content? Thanks in advance! Ryan Doherty rdoherty@mozilla.com
Received on Monday, 18 May 2009 20:04:27 UTC