- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 23:35:05 +0200
- To: "Laura Carlson" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Shelley Powers" <shelley.just@gmail.com>, "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "HTMLWG WG" <public-html@w3.org>, "wai-xtech@w3.org" <wai-xtech@w3.org>
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 22:22:32 +0200, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Simon, > >>> It is not okay to render critical content that is essential to >>> comprehension via CSS. >> >> That's not what I was saying. >> >> I said that the contents of <caption> can be hidden from visual users >> with >> CSS, should the author be reluctant to include it visually. > > Ah. Sorry. You are right. It could. But to me that is a pretty ugly > work around. It a technique that accessibility-aware authors are familiar with and already use to hide e.g. <h1>-<h6> elements. > I worry about authorabilty and confused functionality > (caption and summary serve different proposes). It would be a bit harder to author (for authors who are reluctant to include the information visually), yes. But the same technique can be used for other things on the page, too. > Simon, you are a member of the PF working group. Have you discussed > with them whether your solution provides the needed accessibility > functionality? If so, what was their response? I haven't. I've cc-ed wai-xtech. > The HTML and PF working groups should be working together, reaching > higher, and seeking ways of advancing accessibility for people with > disabilities. I'm not sure that your idea would do it, but it > certainly should be discussed. -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Tuesday, 23 June 2009 21:35:58 UTC