RE: disinterested chairing [was Re: summary="" in HTML5]

+1

Robert J Burns wrote:
> 
> However, you're needlessly exhibiting defensiveness here when the WG
> instead needs you to be be a disinterested leader. Arguments that you
> are justified in ignoring David's or anyone's remarks should not come
> from such a disinterested leader. Also, while a WG chair should
> respond forcefully to unacceptable and unproductive behavior, a chair
> should always do so in a disinterested fashion and not single out one
> side and let others slide.

Received on Friday, 27 February 2009 01:02:08 UTC