- From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:48:56 -0500
- To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Robert J Burns <rob@robburns.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>, Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>, James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>, Joshue O Connor <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie>, Steve Axthelm <steveax@pobox.com>, Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, HTMLWG <public-html@w3.org>, wai-xtech@w3.org, wai-liaison@w3.org, janina@rednote.net, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Matt Morgan-May <mattmay@adobe.com>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "W3C WAI Protocols & Formats" <w3c-wai-pf@w3.org>
I don't think it is possible to associate a <p> programatically</p to a table. It might be possible to designate someting inside the table to surve the same purpurpose as @summary though. I also want to point out that I consider it a grose miss use of @summary="" required to pass a test as well, miss use. I appreciate the efforts on this but also hear and echo the conerns of others that we *really* need to have a good replacement or modify @summary to do what we need for it to do. On Feb 25, 2009, at 2:37 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 10:50 AM, David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net> wrote: > <p> this is a layout table. > <p> there is no summary for this table... > Now, where was that little d? I'm sorry, I don't understand the question? Could you elaborate? > Not picking on you but we need programatic association and clear > markup > which @summary provides today. This would indeed not be the case with the proposal to have a separate paragraph (marked up with a <p>) before or after the table. Could you elaborate on why this is needed? If we added an attribute like summaryfor="idOfTable" to the <p>, would that address all the problems you have with this proposed solution? Or adding a summaryIn="idOfPara" on the <table>. I'm not suggesting this as a solution, merely trying to understand your complaints with the <p> solution. Also, this problem (if it indeed is a problem) does not seem to exist with any of the other solutions proposed. Maciej listed many more than I did. / Jonas > On Feb 25, 2009, at 1:42 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 9:23 AM, David Poehlman > <poehlman1@comcast.net> > wrote: >> >> What actually mystifies me and I've been following every nuounce of >> the >> conversation over a long span on several lists is that there has >> not been >> shown to be anything satisfactorily demonstrated to replace what >> can be >> and >> has been used as such an accessibility enhancing attribute as >> @summary. > > Two suggestions I've seen so far are: > > * Use a <p> above the table describing the contents of the table. > * Change the definition of <caption> to not just be the title of the > table to also be allowed to contain a summary. > > Both these have the advantage if adding accessibility to all users > rather than just ones that use AT clients. > > Another suggestion I've thought about is using the table@title > attribute. Title attributes are already often used to add descriptive > information out-of-flow. And title attributes are generally available > in visual UAs in the form of tooltips. > > / Jonas > > > > -- > Jonnie Appleseed > with his > Hands-On Technolog(eye)s > reducing technology's disabilities > one byte at a time > > -- Jonnie Appleseed with his Hands-On Technolog(eye)s reducing technology's disabilities one byte at a time
Received on Wednesday, 25 February 2009 19:49:47 UTC