- From: Rob Sayre <rsayre@mozilla.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:08:58 -0500
- To: "John Foliot - WATS.ca" <foliot@wats.ca>
- CC: 'Geoffrey Sneddon' <foolistbar@googlemail.com>, 'HTML WG' <public-html@w3.org>, 'W3C WAI-XTECH' <wai-xtech@w3.org>
On 2/23/09 1:02 PM, John Foliot - WATS.ca wrote: > However, the very fact that something must exist will encourage developers > #2 and #3 have 'something' as fallback content. I'm also not sure why #5 is better than #2 or #3. Text that describes the difference might be an interesting read. > The bottom line is that we cannot force anyone to be smart, but we can > construct systems that 'nudge' users in the right direction, Agree. I'll take this to heart in documents I'm working on. > and mandating > some fallback content within the spec does just that. > Mandating is not nudging. Recommending fallback content is a 'nudge'. - Rob
Received on Monday, 23 February 2009 18:09:42 UTC