- From: David Bolter <david.bolter@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:29:29 -0500
- To: "John Foliot - WATS.ca" <foliot@wats.ca>
- CC: 'Boris Zbarsky' <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, 'HTML WG' <public-html@w3.org>, 'W3C WAI-XTECH' <wai-xtech@w3.org>
John Foliot - WATS.ca wrote: > David Bolter wrote: > >> Do we need to have an a11y solution for canvas... >> > > yes > > >> ...or is it a usage problem >> solvable through education and evangelism? I don't know. >> >> cheers, >> David >> > > David, > > <soapbox> > With respect: if you are going to produce an element for content authoring > on the web, then accessibility aspects (DOM hooks or whatever) need to be > part of the spec - full stop. Now, this does not mean that you need to > deliver exact functionality to all users - a11y has never even hinted that > this is a requirement - what is needed is *equivalent* functionality so that > alternative user-agents (or a combination of mainstream user-agents and > adaptive technology) delivers to the end user the content's intent. > > It might take longer, or be less elegant (@longdesc is a wonderful > poster-child for this, which many within the working group still don't > grok), but it is *inclusive*... it doesn't leave some users standing outside > the door with a pat on the head and a "...sorry, we need to do more > education and evangelism to make people understand this". What exactly do > you think the web accessibility community has been doing for the past > decade? (That these types of discussions still need to be had within the > greater 'experts community' 10 years after the launch of W3C's WAI simply > shows that e & e only goes so far). > </soapbox> > > So again, to the first question - yes. > Okay then let's make sure that happens. Where and how is it likely to happen? cheers, David
Received on Thursday, 19 February 2009 00:30:07 UTC