- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 01:09:55 +0000
- To: aurelien.levy@free.fr
- CC: stephane deschamps <stephane.deschamps@orange-ftgroup.com>, John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, W3C WAI-XTECH <wai-xtech@w3.org>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
On 10/12/2009 23:46, aurelien.levy@free.fr wrote: > summary attribut is requiered only for data table and we expect to change the guidelines to limit its use only on complex data table. > > RGAA will be frequently updated specialy when ARIA will become official recommandation, it's a suite of unit test to verify conformity to wcag 2.0 (specially needed by the public services to verify that the webagency is really doing her job correctly when the tender target a wcag compliant website) Ah, j'ai trouvé les documents en question ;) http://references.modernisation.gouv.fr/rgaa-accessibilite So, if I understand it correctly, RGAA is a set of your own normative tests, tied to specific technologies (doing things like mandating actual attributes, like alt for images and summary for data tables), which you then match up to WCAG 2.0 success criteria? It's basically a tightly defined subset of possible techniques (as there may exist a theoretical infinite number of techniques, as long as they pass the SC) that you require authors to adhere to? I can understand the benefit of this for large-scale conformance testing, but you're really then just testing conformance to RGAA, not to WCAG 2.0 (as there are certainly other techniques, not mandated in RGAA's test appendix of the WCAG 2.0 techniques document, which nonetheless pass the SC). Sorry, not being difficult here, just making sure I understand the purpose of RGAA (and to clarify that WCAG 2.0's original intent is not to make any statements as to required or not required attributes...only the SCs matter, and the techniques are merely informative). P -- Patrick H. Lauke ______________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ ______________________________________________________________ Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force http://webstandards.org/ ______________________________________________________________
Received on Friday, 11 December 2009 01:10:55 UTC