Re: Implementing aria: -- examples and methodology

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Anne van Kesteren writes:

> On Thu, 29 May 2008 14:54:51 +0200, Henry S. Thompson
> <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>  wrote:
>> Anne van Kesteren writes:
>>> On Thu, 29 May 2008 13:51:08 +0200, Henry S. Thompson
>>> <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>  wrote:
>>>> These tests were converted from the 'aria-' iCITA examples using the
>>>> above methodology, very easily, and work in IE 7 as well as Firefox,
>>>> Opera and Safari (and, with an edited and rebuilt accessibility
>>>> module in Firefox 3b5, with the ORCA screen-reader).
>>>
>>> These tests are HTML-only, use class names to work around styling
>>> deficiencies of your proposal and don't demonstrate at all that aria:
>>> is  somehow a better alternative to aria- in my opinion.
>>
>> Not so, please look again, there are two identical files, one served
>> as text/html and the other as application/xhtml+xml.  They both work.
>
> Very well, I should've been more careful. Though again, it relies on
> class  names to work around styling deficiencies of your proposal and
> doesn't  demonstrate that aria: is better than aria-. Just that it's
> more complex.

Um, no, the complexity is in the original (which uses aria-) and is
there to work around the fact that IE6 doesn't support attribute
selectors _at all_, regardless of how they are spelled.  Thus my point
that full interoperability respecting legacy browsers is _never_
simple.

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIPq2ckjnJixAXWBoRAvloAJ9leFfL8Ezc6DizlBG2uPgMsHctGQCdGMxo
qyz/W72b827ALOC9kiPbtNo=
=xnmA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Thursday, 29 May 2008 13:28:01 UTC