- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 13:58:50 +0100
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: Aaron M Leventhal <aleventh@us.ibm.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, "public-xhtml2@w3.org" <public-xhtml2@w3.org>, w3c-wai-pf@w3.org, "wai-xtech@w3.org" <wai-xtech@w3.org>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
[sorry, retransmission to correct address line bug]
Ian Hickson writes:
> The cost of aria: is that it puts up a huge barrier for migration from
> HTML to XML, thus reducing the value of the XML universe.
That's the second time someone has said this. Please explain. Please
note that pages using aria: and following the methodology I've
recommended work _today_ whether served as text/html or
application/xhtml+xml, which suggests they _en_courage migration. . .
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFIPqiKkjnJixAXWBoRAkywAJ9t/IOFm1PVpSxqYrP23n3WLtrqpACfWd5w
YT+Y5revU/N79C9LBc200II=
=h+sa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 29 May 2008 13:00:08 UTC