- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 21:41:12 +0200
- To: Gez Lemon <gez.lemon@gmail.com>
- Cc: Geoffrey Sneddon <foolistbar@googlemail.com>, Ret'd Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@rhul.ac.uk>, Dave Singer <singer@apple.com>, HTML Working Group <public-html@w3.org>, W3C WAI-XTECH <wai-xtech@w3.org>
Gez Lemon wrote: > On 15/05/2008, Geoffrey Sneddon <foolistbar@googlemail.com> wrote: >> There's a third option, which is the status quo: output an empty alt >> attribute. They'll keep doing that. It will keep the tool's output passing >> machine checkable conformance criteria (and people will leave it if it >> doesn't), but it still doesn't help accessibility. > > Which authoring tools currently do this? Nvu. 3+ million users. Cross-platform. Wysiwyg. Mozilla. MPL. And I confirm the successor to Nvu will stick to that behaviour. </Daniel>
Received on Thursday, 15 May 2008 19:41:54 UTC