- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 13:00:22 -0500
- To: Matt Morgan-May <mattmay@adobe.com>
- Cc: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, HTML Working Group <public-html@w3.org>, W3C WAI-XTECH <wai-xtech@w3.org>
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 10:46 -0700, Matt Morgan-May wrote: [...] > No, I'm afraid that people who are tired of HTML 4.01 requiring @alt will > flock to HTML5 since it gives them the freedom to ignore accessibility > wholesale. I hope you've overstated your case and that you don't actually subscribe to a position that extreme. There's a huge difference between the class of C programs that the compiler will accept and the class of C programs that don't have bugs. Surely HTML conformance and HTML accessibility are analogous, no? i.e. quality goes beyond conformance. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 12 May 2008 18:00:57 UTC