- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 01:37:01 +0100
- To: HTML4All <list@html4all.org>
- Cc: wai-xtech@w3.org
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 01:22:37 +0100, Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> wrote: > And possibly: unless I'm misunderstanding the idea of > backwards-compatibility. Is it "HTML5 browsers will be able to make > sense of XHTML1/HTML4 documents" (my understanding) or "XHTML1/HTML4 > browsers will be able to work with HTML5 documents"? Even if it's the > latter, the fact that browsers don't throw an error when an XHTML1 image > is missing the mandatory @alt could be explained as backwards compatible > by the WG. It's both actually, for some value of XHTML1/HTML4 browsers. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2008 00:37:28 UTC