- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 08:58:03 -0500
- To: David Poehlman <david.poehlman@handsontechnologeyes.com>
- Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, public-html@w3.org, W3C WAI-XTECH <wai-xtech@w3.org>, wai-liaison@w3.org
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 09:37 -0400, David Poehlman wrote: > You are getting input from AT venders, you just don't know it. I don't know it either. I'd like to know. What input have we gotten from which AT vendors? > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch> > To: "Laura Carlson" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> > Cc: "Steven Faulkner" <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>; <public-html@w3.org>; "W3C > WAI-XTECH" <wai-xtech@w3.org>; <wai-liaison@w3.org> > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 3:23 AM > Subject: Re: table headers - clear description of problem > > > > On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Laura Carlson wrote: > > > > Anyway, has the new replacement for table headers/id gotten to step > > number two in your process? Have AT implementers committed to > > implementing your replacement for headers/id? If so which ones? > > It has unfortunately been nigh on impossible to get any kind of consistent > participation from AT vendors. If anyone can help with this, please let me > know. > -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 26 August 2008 13:57:54 UTC