On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Laura Carlson wrote: > > Anyway, has the new replacement for table headers/id gotten to step > number two in your process? Have AT implementers committed to > implementing your replacement for headers/id? If so which ones? It has unfortunately been nigh on impossible to get any kind of consistent participation from AT vendors. If anyone can help with this, please let me know. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Tuesday, 26 August 2008 07:23:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:25:22 UTC