Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > Flickr is one of many public sites featuring user-generated content that > is mostly shared with friends and family, but which is mostly visible to > the general public. In terms of our moral sensibilities about > accessibility, it is more like a public bulletin board where anyone can > put up a poster, than like the professional signage in a store or school. I do not use Flickr, but I do use Picasaweb, which I believe is analogous. On Picasaweb, albums can be public or private. Would those who seek to differentiate between public and private facilities in terms of accessibility therefore accept that a /public/ album is /public/, and must therefore meet all legal accessibility requirements ? Philip TAYLORReceived on Tuesday, 19 August 2008 09:07:10 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:25:22 UTC