David Poehlman wrote: > I don't think a spec should require accessibility but neither should it > stiffle it's possibility. This, I 100% agree with. I'm even happy with it requiring accessibility in various cases, or better yet being structured such that accessibility Just Happens as the path of least resistance (e.g. the richer form controls). -BorisReceived on Monday, 18 August 2008 23:09:14 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:25:22 UTC