W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > wai-xtech@w3.org > August 2008

Re: Request for clarification of 'In many cases, the image is actually just supplementary'

From: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:05:06 +0100
Message-ID: <55687cf80808180205h195eb8dex1ab5cee57747817e@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)" <P.Taylor@rhul.ac.uk>, "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>
Cc: "W3C WAI-XTECH" <wai-xtech@w3.org>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>

Hi Philip,

to remove any source of ambiguity i have modifed the example.

My question once again is: Would the example below be non-conforming?

<p>The network passes data to the Tokeniser stage, which
passes data to the Tree Construction stage. From there, data goes
to both the DOM and to Script Execution. Script Execution is
linked to the DOM, and, using document.write(), passes data to
the Tokeniser.</p>
<p><img src="images/parsing-model-overview.png" alt="Flowchart
representation of the parsing model."></p>





regards
stevef
Received on Monday, 18 August 2008 09:05:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 20 January 2023 19:58:30 UTC