Wednesday, 30 April 2008
- RE: Updated auto complete proposal
- Re: [XHTML Access] redefining keys and ensuring user control over "activate" (yes tighten)
- [XHTML Access] activate boolean? & asserting user control (update)
Tuesday, 29 April 2008
- Updated auto complete proposal
- Re: [html4all] some reflections on @alt usage
- Image Annotation on the Semantic Web [Incubator Group Report]
Monday, 28 April 2008
- Re: [html4all] some reflections on @alt usage (and even sometimes @aria-labelledby...)
- Re: [html4all] some reflections on @alt usage
- Re: longdesc and ARIA
- Re: longdesc and ARIA Re: [html4all] some reflections on @alt usage
- Re: [html4all] some reflections on @alt usage
- RE: more alt rant
- more alt rant
- Re: [html4all] some reflections on @alt usage
- Re: [html4all] some reflections on @alt usage (and even sometimes @aria-labelledby...)
- Re: [html4all] some reflections on @alt usage
- RE: Re: longdesc and ARIA
- Re: PROPOSAL: Integrate ARIA attributes into the XHTML namespace
- Re: longdesc and ARIA
- Re: [html4all] some reflections on @alt usage (and even sometimes @aria-labelledby...)
- Re: DHTML Style Guide Document Updated
- Re: [html4all] some reflections on @alt usage
- Re: [html4all] some reflections on @alt usage
- longdesc and ARIA Re: [html4all] some reflections on @alt usage
- Re: [html4all] some reflections on @alt usage
- Re: [html4all] some reflections on @alt usage
- Re: [html4all] some reflections on @alt usage
- Re: [html4all] some reflections on @alt usage
Sunday, 27 April 2008
- RE: some reflections on @alt usage
- Re: PROPOSAL: Integrate ARIA attributes into the XHTML namespace
- Re: PROPOSAL: Integrate ARIA attributes into the XHTML namespace
- Re: PROPOSAL: Integrate ARIA attributes into the XHTML namespace
- Re: some reflections on @alt usage
- Re: some reflections on @alt usage
Saturday, 26 April 2008
- Re: PROPOSAL: Integrate ARIA attributes into the XHTML namespace
- Re: PROPOSAL: Integrate ARIA attributes into the XHTML namespace
- Re: PROPOSAL: Integrate ARIA attributes into the XHTML namespace
- Re: Opera, VoiceOver and alt (was: One more thought...)
Friday, 25 April 2008
- RE: PROPOSAL: Integrate ARIA attributes into the XHTML namespace
- PROPOSAL: Integrate ARIA attributes into the XHTML namespace
- DHTML Style Guide Document Updated
- Opera, VoiceOver and alt (was: One more thought...)
Thursday, 24 April 2008
- Re: some reflections on @alt usage
- Re: some reflections on @alt usage
- Re: [XHTML Access] redefining keys and ensuring user control over "activate" (yes tighten)
- Re: some reflections on @alt usage
- Re: [XHTML Access] redefining keys and ensuring user control over "activate" (yes tighten)
- Re: [XHTML Access] must "activate" be boolean? (not must, but should)
Wednesday, 23 April 2008
- Re: some reflections on @alt usage
- Re: Updated: Date Picker Widget
- Re: Fw: rangeslider, a "Tale of Two Thumbs"
- Uncertainty Reasoning for the World Wide Web
- what's in a name? Common Web Language Report
Tuesday, 22 April 2008
- Re: some reflections on @alt usage
- some reflections on @alt usage
- Re: rangeslider, a "Tale of Two Thumbs"
Monday, 21 April 2008
- Re: alt and authoring practices
- Re: alt and authoring practices
- Re: alt and authoring practices
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: alt and authoring practices
- Re: alt and authoring practices
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
Sunday, 20 April 2008
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
Saturday, 19 April 2008
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
Friday, 18 April 2008
- Re: Collecting of data about alt usage
- Re: math role for ARIA - ARIA Subteam Public Meeting Minutes 2008-03-31 [DRAFT]
- Re: Image Report feature in Validator.nu
- Re: [html4all] Image Report feature in Validator.nu
- Re: [html4all] Image Report feature in Validator.nu
- Re: Image Report feature in Validator.nu
- Image Report feature in Validator.nu
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: alt and authoring practices and validation behaviour
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: math role for ARIA - ARIA Subteam Public Meeting Minutes 2008-03-31 [DRAFT]
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- RE: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- RE: alt and authoring practices
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- RE: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
Thursday, 17 April 2008
- RE: [XHTML Access] must "activate" be boolean?
- RE: rangeslider, a "Tale of Two Thumbs"
- RE: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- RE: rangeslider, a "Tale of Two Thumbs"
- Re: rangeslider, a "Tale of Two Thumbs"
- rangeslider, a "Tale of Two Thumbs"
- testing the theory that required alt = bad
- new variant proposal on alt=? issues
- Re: [XHTML Access] must "activate" be boolean?
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- RE: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: alt and authoring practices
- RE: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- RE: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- RE: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- RE: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
Wednesday, 16 April 2008
- Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: alt and authoring practices
- Re: alt and authoring practices
- Re: alt and authoring practices
- RE: alt and authoring practices
- Re: alt and authoring practices
- RE: alt and authoring practices
- More effective approaches? (was RE: [html4all] Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools)
- Is this an accurate reflection of where we stand today? (was RE: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft))
- Re: several messages about alt
- RE: alt and authoring practices
- Re: several messages about alt
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- alt and authoring practices
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: alt and authoring practices
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: alt and authoring practices
- Re: [html4all] Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: [html4all] Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: [html4all] Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: [html4all] Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: [html4all] On HTML WG process - was [Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools]
- Re: On HTML5 conformance and conformance checking
- [Fwd: Collecting of data about alt usage]
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: alt and authoring practices
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: alt and authoring practices
- alt and authoring practices
- "Social engineering" Re: [html4all] Request for review of alt and alt value ...
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: [html4all] Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: [html4all] Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: [html4all] Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- On HTML WG process - was [Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools]
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- RE: Style guide: request two agenda items.
- RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: [html4all] Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
Tuesday, 15 April 2008
- Re: there are markup options [was: Re: img/alt summary attempt]
- RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: there are markup options [was: Re: img/alt summary attempt]
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: there are markup options [was: Re: img/alt summary attempt]
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: there are markup options [was: Re: img/alt summary attempt]
- Re: there are markup options [was: Re: img/alt summary attempt]
- Re: there are markup options [was: Re: img/alt summary attempt]
- RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: there are markup options [was: Re: img/alt summary attempt]
- RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: there are markup options [was: Re: img/alt summary attempt]
- Re: Propose adoption of the term "text alternative" (as defined in WCAG 2.0) in HTML5
- RE: The Philosophy of @alt (was [html4all] several messages about alt)
- RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Propose adoption of the term "text alternative" (as defined in WCAG 2.0) in HTML5
- RE: Style guide: request two agenda items.
- there are markup options [was: Re: img/alt summary attempt]
- Re: Updated: Date Picker Widget
- Style guide: request two agenda items.
- Re: [html4all] img/alt summary attempt
- Re: img/alt summary attempt
- Re: img/alt summary attempt
- RE: img/alt summary attempt
- Re: img/alt summary attempt
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] several messages about alt
Monday, 14 April 2008
- RE: [html4all] several messages about alt
- Re: On HTML5 conformance and conformance checking
- RE: Style guide: tristatecheckbox
- Re: [XHTML Access] must "activate" be boolean?
- RE: Style guide: tristatecheckbox
- img/alt summary attempt
- [XHTML Access] redefining keys and ensuring user control over "activate"
- [XHTML Access] must "activate" be boolean?
- Re: On HTML5 conformance and conformance checking
- Re: On HTML5 conformance and conformance checking
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: Propose removal or modification of the "Rorschach inkblot test" example and accompanying text.
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- On HTML5 conformance and conformance checking
- Re: Style guide: tristatecheckbox
- Re: math role for ARIA - ARIA Subteam Public Meeting Minutes 2008-03-31 [DRAFT]
- Re: Unready and social engineering Re: [html4all] several messages about alt
- RE: Style guide: tristatecheckbox
- Re: [html4all] Unready and social engineering Re: several messages about alt
- RE: Style guide: tristatecheckbox
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] Unready and social engineering Re: several messages about alt
- Re: Style guide: rich text editor
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] Unready and social engineering Re: several messages about alt
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: Point of clarification in alt debate(s)
- Re: [html4all] several messages about alt
- Re: [html4all] Unready and social engineering Re: several messages about alt
- Re: Propose removal or modification of the "Rorschach inkblot test" example and accompanying text.
- Re: Unready and social engineering Re: [html4all] several messages about alt
- Re: [html4all] several messages about alt
- Re: Unready and social engineering Re: [html4all] several messages about alt
- Re: [html4all] several messages about alt
- Re: [html4all] several messages about alt
- Re: [html4all] several messages about alt
- Re: [html4all] several messages about alt
- Unready and social engineering Re: [html4all] several messages about alt
- RE: Point of clarification in alt debate(s)
- Re: [html4all] several messages about alt
- Re: [html4all] several messages about alt
- Re: [html4all] several messages about alt
- Re: [html4all] several messages about alt
- Re: [html4all] several messages about alt
- Re: Propose removing "An image in an e-mail or document intended for a specific person who is known to be able to view images" from the HTML5 spec.
- Re: Propose removing "An image in an e-mail or document intended for a specific person who is known to be able to view images" from the HTML5 spec.
- Re: [html4all] several messages about alt
Sunday, 13 April 2008
- Re: Point of clarification in alt debate(s)
- Point of clarification in alt debate(s)
- Re: [html4all] several messages about alt
- Re: Propose removal or modification of the "Rorschach inkblot test" example and accompanying text.
- Re: Propose removal or modification of the "Rorschach inkblot test" example and accompanying text.
- Re: Propose removal or modification of the "Rorschach inkblot test" example and accompanying text.
- Re: Propose removal or modification of the "Rorschach inkblot test" example and accompanying text.
- Propose removal or modification of the "Rorschach inkblot test" example and accompanying text.
- Re: [html4all] several messages about alt
- Re: Propose removing "An image in an e-mail or document intended for a specific person who is known to be able to view images" from the HTML5 spec.
- Re: several messages about alt
- Re: several messages about alt
- Re: Propose removing "An image in an e-mail or document intended for a specific person who is known to be able to view images" from the HTML5 spec.
- Re: several messages about alt
- Re: several messages about alt
- Re: Propose removing "An image in an e-mail or document intended for a specific person who is known to be able to view images" from the HTML5 spec.
Saturday, 12 April 2008
- Re: Propose removing "An image in an e-mail or document intended for a specific person who is known to be able to view images" from the HTML5 spec.
- Re: [html4all] Propose removing "An image in an e-mail or document intended for a specific person who is known to be able to view images" from the HTML5 spec.
- Re: let's discuss aria on #wai-aria
- Re: let's discuss aria on #wai-aria
- Re: Propose removing "An image in an e-mail or document intended for a specific person who is known to be able to view images" from the HTML5 spec.
- Propose removing "An image in an e-mail or document intended for a specific person who is known to be able to view images" from the HTML5 spec.
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- RE: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
Friday, 11 April 2008
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- RE: Disparity between WCAG 2.0 and HTML5 editors definition of text alternative
- Re: Disparity between WCAG 2.0 and HTML5 editors definition of text alternative
- Re: Disparity between WCAG 2.0 and HTML5 editors definition of text alternative
- Disparity between WCAG 2.0 and HTML5 editors definition of text alternative
- RE: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- RE: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- RE: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- RE: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: Style guide: radio button
- Re: Style guide: tristatecheckbox
- Re: Style guide: tristatecheckbox
- RE: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- RE: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: omitting alt: closing an open issue with a bound action item in progress
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: let's discuss aria on #wai-aria
- Re: let's discuss aria on #wai-aria
- Re: process Re: omitting alt: closing an open ...
- let's discuss aria on #wai-aria
- RE: Style guide: rich text editor
- RE: Style guide: rich text editor
- process Re: omitting alt: closing an open ...
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: omitting alt: closing an open issue with a bound action item in progress
- Re: omitting alt: closing an open issue with a bound action item in progress
- RE: Style guide: combo box
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: math role for ARIA - ARIA Subteam Public Meeting Minutes 2008-03-31 [DRAFT]
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: validity and other important things Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- validity and other important things Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: Style guide: rich text editor
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: Style guide: rich text editor
- Re: Style guide: rich text editor
- Re: Style guide: rich text editor
- Style guide: wizard
- Style guide: rich text editor
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Style guide: radio button
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Style guide: combo box
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: omitting alt: closing an open issue with a bound action item in progress
- Style guide: tristatecheckbox
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Style guide: comments on alert
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Style guide: incremental find as you type in widgets
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: math role for ARIA - ARIA Subteam Public Meeting Minutes 2008-03-31 [DRAFT]
- New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: several messages relating to the alt="" attribute
- omitting alt: closing an open issue with a bound action item in progress
Thursday, 10 April 2008
- Re: several messages relating to the alt="" attribute
- Re: Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration
- Re: Role attribute values
- Re: Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration
- Re: Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration
- Re: Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration
- Re: Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration
- Google Widget Toolkit 1.5 with ARIA support announced
- Re: Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration
Wednesday, 9 April 2008
- Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration
- Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration
- Re: Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration
- Re: Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration
- Re: Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration
- Re: homogenized XML Entity Names and AT
- homogenized XML Entity Names and AT
- Re: Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration
- accessible custom hotkeys
- Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration
Tuesday, 8 April 2008
Monday, 7 April 2008
- Re: on-screen keyboards and Web page structure
- Re: on-screen keyboards and Web page structure
- on-screen keyboards and Web page structure
- DHTML Style Guide Meeting Tomorrow April 8 at 12 noon Eastern
Thursday, 3 April 2008
Tuesday, 1 April 2008
- Re: Updated: Date Picker Widget
- Re: Thanks! Re: Runnable suggestion of ARIA in HTML5 document conformance integration
- Re: Thanks! Re: Runnable suggestion of ARIA in HTML5 document conformance integration
- Re: Thanks! Re: Runnable suggestion of ARIA in HTML5 document conformance integration
- DHTML Style Guide Meeting today at 12 noon Eastern