- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 19:39:44 +0200
- To: "Richard Schwerdtfeger" <schwer@us.ibm.com>, unagi69@concentric.net
- Cc: "XHTML 2 WG" <public-xhtml2@w3.org>, Xtech <wai-xtech@w3.org>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Hi Rich, On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 18:26:00 +0200, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com> wrote: > If it were publicly available (HTML, XHTML, SVG) we could potentially > have 100 people on the call. As it was it was a challenge to minute > this. I do not want to manage a call of that size and we need to get > things moving forward. While I appreaciate the issue if 100 people *do* turn up, I think that it is counter to the agreement under which the public groups work to set up a private meeting with your chosen set of participants. There is a precedent for each group selecting people to represent it (e.g. Forms task force) which is much more in line with W3C process. It can take a little longer to set up, but it should resolve problems like half a group feeling they are unrepresented and then having to decide whether there is some material impact (apart from a round of emails from "Outraged of Oslo" and "Misrepresented of Mississippi" pointing out that they *could* have been unrepresented). Perhaps it is a better idea to get the groups to formally appoint a task force where relevant. It certainly reduces the opportunities to accuse you of doing it with some bias or other. > The people involved were leaders trying to adopt aria in html, > svg, and xhtml. The people chosen were *some of* the leaders in adopting ARIA, I think. Possibly a very representative sample, even. But there is a difference. > I felt it would be more productive to get the leaders to agree on some > proposals and then take them back to their respective groups for > discussion. I have posted the minutes on the xhtml 2, html, and pf lists. When working outside W3C process like this, I am very glad that you took minutes and posted them to the relevant groups. That's vastly superior to just editing a spec in such a way that the group does not know where the change came from or why. So thank you for doing that. cheers Chaals (aka "Get 2 cents in of Getafe") -- Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk http://my.opera.com/chaals Try the Kestrel - Opera 9.5 alpha
Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2007 17:55:40 UTC