- From: Schnabel, Stefan <stefan.schnabel@sap.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 11:20:34 +0200
- To: <unagi69@concentric.net>
- Cc: <wai-xtech@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <A0F55B8DE2D56245AE2D0578E57450CE02E9F80C@dewdfe25.wdf.sap.corp>
thanks everybody for input. I think classification if zooming is A or AA level is still of interest. anyway, we plan to use/fulfil both levels. Best regards, Stefan ________________________________ From: wai-xtech-request@w3.org [mailto:wai-xtech-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Gregory J. Rosmaita Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 5:34 AM To: Schnabel, Stefan Cc: wai-xtech@w3.org Subject: Re: Relative Units for Font Size Scaling W3C requirement replaced by zoom techniques in new Browsers? aloha, stefan! zoom is to screen magnification as simple text-to-speech engines are to screen readers... zooming only earns a single-A compliance, in that it provides a BASE functionality (zooming the viewport) just as a simple TTS engine performs BASE functions -- such as key echo, typing echo, announcing system messages -- but it is NO substitute for a screen reader. likewise, for those with vision over 20/200 zoom is a great benefit, but those with less visual acuity need software that will follow the flow defined for the document, not merely zoom the viewport. likewise, there are those who benefit from a limited viewport, with high magnification and often high-contrast, who benefit either from supplemental speech and/or aural feedback in the form of pure sound cues, something that zoom in IE7 and narrator on WinXP cannot provide. narrator is better than nothing when one's main speech engine freezes, crashes or just goes silent, but i wouldn't use it to do online commerce or banking. absolute font values should -- in my opinion -- be relegated to the print media type, while the screen media type should use relative measurements to accomodate the user's desires -- even if a user is viewing text at 75 times normal size, a change in font-size defined using a percentage still applies to the zoomed text, producing -- only on a larger scale -- the intended intent. absolute pixel and point settings are meaningless outside of the print media selector -- not to mention direct derivatives of print conventions, which is where it not only should remain, but where it belongs. so, scaling of fonts according to percentage or using em is still necessary, and is a concept that needs desperately to be ported to the values defined for aural CSS (or, if you prefer, CSS3-Speech Module) instead of defining 50, on a scale of 0 to 100 as the baseline from which aural styling starts to affect aural rendering; increasing the richness, stress, or pitch by degrees relative to whatever the users' default settings are, would be a far more effective means of fine-tuning aural style sheets gregory. ----------------------------------------------------------------- PEDESTRIAN, n. The variable (and audible) part of the roadway for an automobile. -- Ambrose Bierce, _The Devil's Dictionary_ ----------------------------------------------------------------- Gregory J. Rosmaita, oedipus@hicom.net Camera Obscura: http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/index.html UBATS: United Blind Advocates for Talking Signs: http://ubats.org ----------------------------------------------------------------- -- "He who lives on Hope, dies farting." -- Benjamin Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanack -- Gregory J. Rosmaita, unagi69@concentric.net Camera Obscura: http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/
Received on Thursday, 24 May 2007 09:42:54 UTC