- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:13:15 -0700
- To: James Graham <jg307@cam.ac.uk>
- CC: Craig Francis <craig@synergycms.com>, "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, wai-xtech@w3.org, joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie
James Graham wrote: > I am less sure about this, at least in the context of the example > given. I can imagine no reason that information could not be included > either as additional content on the page containing the image or as an > external resource connected by a perfectly ordinary hyperlink. Why is > this not the case? > Although the "real answer" is "because the author wanted it to be less blatant, i.e. it was a peripheral piece of information that would clutter the page most would see, including those who couldn't care less about Cornwall, or whatever. Love.
Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2007 22:13:35 UTC