- From: Gez Lemon <gez.lemon@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:19:14 +0100
- To: "Schnabel, Stefan" <stefan.schnabel@sap.com>
- Cc: wai-xtech@w3.org
Hi Stefan, On 25/06/07, Schnabel, Stefan <stefan.schnabel@sap.com> wrote: <blockquote> It has been reported that Jaws 7.1 and above ignores an image in HTML if the image tag has a blank alt attribute like alt=" ". FreedomScientific claims that this is the industry standard and a WAI recommendation. If an image has a blank attribute, it is to be ignored by the screen reader no matter what other attributes it contains. Does anybody know if such a recommendation exists from WAI? And where can I find that? </blockquote> I don't know of any recommendation that states that a screen reader must ignore images if null alt text is provided, as there are circumstances where that just wouldn't be possible (such as where an image is used as the link phrase for a target element with no other text in the link phrase). Also, JAWS 7.1 and above doesn't ignore images in these circumstances, but will try and provide context from other attributes. In terms of images that have no functional purpose with a null alt attribute, then I think JAWS' approach of ignoring the image is correct. For example, it wouldn't make sense to provide a URI to the long description of something that is unlabelled, as a user wouldn't know what they were getting a description of. Similarly, it wouldn't make sense to provide advisory information through the title attribute, as there would be no context for the extra information. If the image has a non-decorative purpose, then it should have appropriate alt text - if it doesn't have any purpose other than decoration, then ideally it should be included in the presentation layer with CSS. Best regards, Gez -- _____________________________ Supplement your vitamins http://juicystudio.com
Received on Monday, 25 June 2007 12:19:20 UTC