- From: Michael A Squillace <masquill@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:58:34 -0600
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org, wai-liaison@w3.org, wai-xtech@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFA26CE82F.B1E552B9-ON852573B6.00708A0E-862573B6.007312DD@us.ibm.com>
I am a little skeptical of this effort, starting with its rather limited
board composition - three members: Microsoft, Adobe, and a rep from a
company with which few are familiar. Second, from the "Working Groups and
Current Projects" section on:
http://www.accessinteropalliance.org/aboutus/index.html
we have, among the four projects mentioned:
1. Internet Explorer Support of Web ARIA via UIA Express
-- Work to enhance Microsoft's IE browser to support these additional
specifications
Why is a group that is, "encouraging the enhancement of current
technologies, the creation of new technology, and promoting the
implementation of these APIs and specifications cross-platform and across
the industry," focusing on one browser and one proprietary accessibility
architecture?
2. Interoperability of Accessibility APIs: UIA and IAccessible2
-- Work to extend UIA and IAccessible2 so that accessibility
functionalities of products built to these specifications can be
interoperable
While there is no doubt that there is always room for improvement, why do
we need to call out the "extension" of IAccessible2 specifically? It's
already an accepted, open standard that was deliberately designed to be
consistent with AT-SPI, thus helping to mitigate precisely the
inconsistency that the AIA wants to remedy. It seems to me that UIA
Express ought to be morphing to IAccessible2 and, in turn, to ARIA, not
vice versa.
Finally, the AIA, "may also pursue formal standardization of the resulting
technologies and/or specifications, recognizing the value of adoption by
standards bodies (such as ANSI and ISO) in driving mainstream use." As
Gregory asks, is the AIA going to be working with the W3C or the Open A11y
Working Group of the Linux Foundation to insure that any resulting
standards proposals are harmonious with ARIA and IA2? Should we invite one
of the three board members to PF or should PF attempt via the W3C to
become a board member of the AIA?
--> Mike Squillace
IBM Human Ability and Accessibility Center
Austin, TX
W:512.823.7423
M:512.970.0066
masquill@us.ibm.com
www.ibm.com/able
"Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>
Sent by: wai-xtech-request@w3.org
12/19/2007 01:57 PM
To
wai-xtech@w3.org, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org, wai-liaison@w3.org
cc
Subject
Accessibility Interoperability Alliance (AIA)
aloha!
does anyone have any information they can share with the W3C community
about the Accessibility Interoperability Alliance (AIA)
http://www.accessinteropalliance.org/
to quote from the AIA press release dated 2007/12/10:
<q
cite="http://www.accessinteropalliance.org/newsevents/pr121007.html">
Industry Alliance Aims to Increase Accessibility, Interoperability and
Innovation
</q>
so i was wondering how the AIA plans to work with other related fora,
such as the W3C/WAI, the Open Accessibility Workgroup at the Linux
Foundation (http://a11y.org/), and the many other entities with which
communication and harmonization of efforts is essential?
for example, how does the AIA view the work on IAccessible2 that is being
conducted at:
http://www.linux-foundation.org/en/Accessibility/IAccessible2
will it sync with work on the Accessible Tool Kit/Assistive Technology
Special Programming Interface (ATK/AT-SPI) framework, which has a mapping
to IAccessible2, as well as other platform-agnostic accessibility
applications, APIs, or architectures?
http://accessibility.linux-foundation.org/a11yspecs/atspi/adoc/
all i know about the AIA, i've gleaned from their web site... there is
a steering committee comprised of of 3: an Information Technology Member,
an Assistive Technology member, and an at-large member... the current
composition of the AIA steering committee (through january 2010) is:
* IT Member: Andrew Kirkpatrick, Corporate Accessibility Engineering
Lead - Adobe;
* AT Member: Claudio Giugliemma, CEO - QualiLife;
* At-Large Member: Rob Sinclair, Director of Accessibility - Microsoft
QualiLife is an entity with which i am not familiar, but on their web
site, they state:
<q cite="http://qualilife.com/home/index.cfm">
Our software technologies (Assistive Technologies) have been conceived
and developed to fulfill the real needs of all people with physical
disabilities, of any age, degree and type of disability. We provide full
accessibility to all existing technologies in all fields, like:
Telephony, Environmental control, Verbal and Written communication,
Internet, fax, e-mail, SMS, DVD, Audio & Video, Virtual Reality, Business
Solutions, Web, Games, etc.
</q>
and they do offer a very impressive array and scope of products, but they
do not seem to be a W3C member organization, or at least i could not find
them when i queried the member-confidential search facility using the
option "All W3C" -- in fact, the only hit i obtained was a link to the
minutes of a meeting (archived in member-confidential space, since it was
at a member-confidential meeting) at which i asked if anyone was familiar
with QualiLife...
can anyone shed any light on this initiative? is anyone liaising with
AIA?
gregory.
--------------------------------------------------------------
You cannot depend on your eyes when your imagination is out of
focus. -- Mark Twain
--------------------------------------------------------------
Gregory J. Rosmaita: oedipus@hicom.net
Camera Obscura: http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/
Oedipus' Online Complex: http://my.opera.com/oedipus
--------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 19 December 2007 20:59:05 UTC