- From: Lisa Seeman <lisa@ubaccess.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 03:55:01 +0200
- To: Will Pearson <will-pearson@tiscali.co.uk>, wai-xtech@w3.org
Received on Friday, 12 November 2004 01:55:59 UTC
----- Whilst the semantics of the role are conveyed by the proposed tag, I don't see how it covers other encoding channels such as spatial relationships. For example, there could be an advertising image to the left of a block of text. The semantic meaning conveyed by this relationship may be that the image is an advertisement for the text content, ie. a picture of a product and some blurb about that product next to it. Is it upto the role tag to provide this level of precision in specifying the role of something? Lisa: The role tag can not cover that level of detail, and you are right the role tag itself is a bit limiting. What you are talking about can be done easily in RDF. As I see it Role is a step towards capturing knowledge in XHTML. I think the idea is to capture part easily and then revert to more typical knowledge capture syntax keep well Lisa
Received on Friday, 12 November 2004 01:55:59 UTC