- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 12:55:49 -0500
- To: lisa seeman <seeman@netvision.net.il>
- Cc: 'Charles McCathieNevile' <charles@sidar.org>, wai-xtech@w3.org, edd@usefulinc.com
Hi Lisa [snip] I like this approach a lot. In other circles it gets discussed occasionally as "RDF sitemaps" although there isn't a lot yet by way of fully polished proposals. Some sitemap discussion has focussed on generic navigation concepts, 'next', 'prev', 'up', 'down', but I actually prefer the line I understand you're taking, which picks out common re-occuring concepts that appear in different kinds of sites. So opensource projects (cc:'ing Edd Dumbill here, who has been looking at this) stereotypically use navigation which include things like "design docs page", "mailing lists", "CVS server", "downloads". Corporate sites, by contrast, often have headings such as "products", "solutions", "leadership", "vision" and suchlike. Though slightly different wording will be used (or very different wording, for sites that aren't in English :) I very much like the idea of slowly growing a set of RDF classes that capture such notions, so we can make some of these distinctions machine-readable and hence accessible to navigation tools, query engines etc. Dan
Received on Thursday, 15 January 2004 12:55:49 UTC