- From: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2001 12:33:34 -0500
- To: wai-xtech@w3.org
See, e.g. isochronous - a whatis definition http://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/0,,sid9_gci212403,00.html or more generally http://www.google.com/search?q=isochronous For consumers, I think that the "synchronized" and "time-dependent" language that we have in the WCAG 2 drafts is better. But we should be aware that there are techies in the "real-time communication" business who use this term. It rolls in the metric sense of "time-dependent" presentation -- that the measure of the time difference between events matters, not just the ordering of events across processes. It is used to avoid saying "real-time" because that is actually a narrower meaning. It includes real-time streams and streams that have to create the illusion of real time. And bundles of streams whose presentations have to combine so as to sustain a common illusion of real time. Al
Received on Monday, 3 December 2001 12:24:43 UTC