RE: WCAG 1.0 errata

Gregg wrote:
> ... [though why one would have an
> errata link before you had errata is a good question].

Regarding WCAG 1.0, there is an errata document [1]. but even for new
rec's, a placeholder errata document can easily be prepared and inplace
when the rec is published.

[1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WAI-WEBCONTENT-ERRATA

Regards,
Phill Jenkins,  (512) 838-4517



Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu> on 09/23/2002 10:35:14 PM

Please respond to gv@trace.wisc.edu

To:    Phill Jenkins/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, "'Ian B. Jacobs'" <ij@w3.org>
cc:    jbrewer@w3.org, wai-wcag-editor@w3.org
Subject:    RE: WCAG 1.0 errata



The question is :   Can we add a link now -- or is that something that
would have had to be in the original doc?  [though why one would have an
errata link before you had errata is a good question].


Gregg

------------------------------------
Gregg Vanderheiden Ph.D.
Ind Engr - Biomed - Trace, Univ of Wis
gv@trace.wisc.edu




-----Original Message-----
From: Phill Jenkins [mailto:pjenkins@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 2:40 PM
To: Ian B. Jacobs
Cc: gv@trace.wisc.edu; jbrewer@w3.org; wai-wcag-editor@w3.org
Subject: Re: WCAG 1.0 errata


      PJ: comments in reply to Ian's reply

>Phill Jenkins wrote:
>>
>> Well, there is one W3C rec that does have "errata" and "translation"
in
the
>> top matter - see [1].  I also agree that "techniques" could be added.
>
>The Comm Team policy is now that errata and translations links
>must appear in at least the head of the document.
>
>I have resisted putting a Techniques link at the top of UAAG 1.0.
>There are plenty of links to the Techs doc in the intro text
>and at the beginning of the section on the Guidelines.
>
  >_ Ian

  PJ: good & agree

> Also, what we just discussed in the ATAG working group was a "related
> document" link that would go back to the working group home page
section
> with a list of peer and related documents (mini doc map) that would
put
the
> current doc in context with other documents. This section would of
course
> map back the WAI home page for the other related resources.  ATAG is
in
the
> middle of ATAG 1.0, techniques, ATAG 1.x/wombat, it's associated
> techniques, a version with and without icons, evaluation techniques,
etc.
> so a "related documents" link should prove useful.  WCAG is in a
similar
> situation with WCAG 1.0, techniques, and WCAG 2.0.

Section 1.1 of UAAG 1.0 has a link to the WAI Resources page:

   http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-UAAG10-20020821/intro.html#context

  - Ian

  PJ: problem with this is that when "related documents change" the spec
  document is out of date.  The disadvantage is that when printed, the
  related section is not included.  As an old timer and as the Web is
more
  common & useful than printed docs, I would prefer NOT to include too
much
  detail about related docs. but point to a section in the working group
  and WAI home pages. From a "current snap shot point of view - I really
  like what UAAG includes - just not where it is.

>
> [1] Example of errata & translations in top matter of W3C spec
> http://www.w3.org/TR/P3P/
>
> Regards,
> Phill Jenkins,  (512) 838-4517
> IBM Research Division - Accessibility Center
> 11501 Burnet Rd,  Austin TX  78758    http://www.ibm.com/able
>
>
>
> Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu> on 09/16/2002 10:50:54 AM
>
> Please respond to gv@trace.wisc.edu
>
> To:    Phill Jenkins/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, jbrewer@w3.org
> cc:    w3c-wai-sc@w3.org
> Subject:    RE: WCAG 1.0 errata
>
>
>
> Problem now is that we can't add it without changing the doc.  (or
> putting it in errata - grin)
>
> Good idea for next time.
>
> I would like it to be EVEN MORE obvious though than the other links
>
> Also - a link to TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCs for the guidelines (though
that
> is what the techniques are)
>
>
> Gregg
>
> ------------------------------------
> Gregg Vanderheiden Ph.D.
> Ind Engr - Biomed - Trace, Univ of Wis
> gv@trace.wisc.edu
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-wai-sc-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-sc-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Phill Jenkins
> Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 10:41 AM
> To: gv@trace.wisc.edu; jbrewer@w3.org
> Cc: w3c-wai-sc@w3.org
> Subject: WCAG 1.0 errata
>
>
>
> Gregg, following up on your point in today's Steering Council, I
believe
> the Errata link could be more prominently placed in the top matter of
> the
> recommendation.  Today there is already a "This Version" and a "Latest
> Version", but not mention  of "Errata".  Adding a link to "Errata"
> between
> "Latest version" and "Previous version" is my suggestion.  "Errata" is
> currently buried below the "Status of this document" section.
> Also, "Latest version" could link to the actual "Second Edition" if or
> when
> it becomes a reality.  The "Latest version" is the link that other
> policy
> documents should be using.
>
> <begin clip>
> Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0
>     W3C Recommendation 5-May-1999
>     This version:
>           http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WAI-WEBCONTENT-19990505
>           (plain text, PostScript, PDF, gzip tar file of HTML, zip
> archive
>           of HTML)
>     Latest version:
>           http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT
>     Previous version:
>           http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WAI-WEBCONTENT-19990324
>     Editors:
>           Wendy Chisholm, Trace R & D Center, University of Wisconsin
--
>           Madison
>           Gregg Vanderheiden, Trace R & D Center, University of
> Wisconsin
>           -- Madison
>           Ian Jacobs, W3C
>
>
>
>     Copyright C 1999
>
>
>     <end clip>
>
>     Regards,
>     Phill Jenkins,  (512) 838-4517
>     IBM Research Division - Accessibility Center
>     11501 Burnet Rd,  Austin TX  78758    http://www.ibm.com/able
>
>
>
>
>


--
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                     +1 718 260-9447

Regards,
Phill Jenkins,  (512) 838-4517
IBM Research Division - Accessibility Center
11501 Burnet Rd,  Austin TX  78758    http://www.ibm.com/able
Internal tieline 678-4517        http://w3.austin.ibm.com/~snsinfo

Received on Tuesday, 24 September 2002 11:23:42 UTC