- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2001 09:18:44 -0800
- To: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>, <wai-tech-comments@w3.org>
- Cc: "Al Gilman" <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
At 10:57 PM 12/22/2001 +0000, Sean B. Palmer wrote: >Since it's no longer 1980 Nor even 2000. If XAG is honed, then XHTML won't be anything "special" - just another item in parallel with MenuML, etc. If it has a cult following, then so long as it is XAG compliant and the tools for writing in it are ATAG conformant we need not worry our pretty little heads about it. Job One is to assure that those who use it are protected by those who design it who are slaves to XAG and careful to keep ATAG in mind so people without limbs/voices/eyes/ears/English can make nice home pages using it. Mainly all the "reviews" done herein should have the form "XAG conformance is..." in some sort of EARL assertion. -- Love. EACH UN-INDEXED/ANNOTATED WEB POSTING WE MAKE IS TESTAMENT TO OUR HYPOCRISY
Received on Sunday, 23 December 2001 12:19:02 UTC