- From: Daniel Dardailler <daniel.dardailler@sophia.inria.fr>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 15:38:36 +0200
- To: robin@knowscape.com
- cc: wai-tech-comments@w3.org
Thanks! > > Depending on the feedback received, this document may become a W3C > > Note, be integrated in the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines suite > > (e.g as a technique for XML) or enter its own Recommendation track. > > > > Please send comments about the content of this document and how you > > would like to see it evolving to the publicly archived mailing list: > > wai-tech-comments@w3.org. > > This is one of the best documents I've seen come out of the W3C in a while. > It is clear, concise, and makes a lot of sense. I'd been looking for an XML > vocabulary design document that went beyond "should I use an attribute or an > element here" or "should I append a version number to my namespace" for a > long time and this is the first one I find that is really worth reading. > > I personally think that it should enter its own Rec track if only so that it > can gain better visibility. Other W3C specs that deal with XML vocabularies > should reference it directly, specifying how and when they followed its > techniques. > > -- > _______________________________________________________________________ > Robin Berjon <robin@knowscape.com> -- CTO > k n o w s c a p e : // venture knowledge agency www.knowscape.com > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > I think... I think it's in my basement... Let me go upstairs and > check. > -- Escher
Received on Thursday, 30 August 2001 09:38:40 UTC