Re: Selecting Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools

Will do. Wasn't sure if they should just be considered 'editorial'.

Andrew

____________________________________

Andrew Arch
Principal Accessibility Consultant, Intopia<http://intopia.digital/>

p: +61 (0)447 389 137 | t: @Intopia<https://twitter.com/Intopia>  @amja<https://twitter.com/amja>

________________________________
From: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, 9 February 2024 13:51
To: Andrew Arch <andrew@intopia.digital>
Cc: wai-eo-editors@w3.org <wai-eo-editors@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Selecting Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools

Thanks, Andrew!

Please do put these as GitHub issues.

Thanks,
~Shawn


On 08-Feb-24 6:18 PM, Andrew Arch wrote:
> Hi there, just a couple of editorial comments
>
>  1. Section: Selecting Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools
>      1. “We cannot check all accessibility aspects automatically. Human judgement is required.” – who is “We” when the topic is what the tools can/cannot do?
>         Suggest: “Tools cannot check all accessibility aspects automatically. Human judgement is required.”
>
>  2. Section: Main Features
>      1. Type of tool: I notice that we don’t have “Continuous Integration” tools listed here (or in the database filter. Noting that there seemed to be some CI tools in the database.)
>         Consider adding here (and as a filter option in the database)
>
> Cheers,  Andrew
>
> ____________________________________
>
> Andrew Arch
> Principal Accessibility Consultant, Intopia <http://intopia.digital/>
>
> Mobile: +61 (0)447 389 137
>
> Web: https://intopia.digital <https://intopia.digital>
>
> /Please note I only work Tuesday through Thursday/
>
> Intopia Logo
>
> I have sent this message at a convenient time for me. It’s not my expectation that you read, respond, or action this message outside of your preferred working hours.
>
> We acknowledgethe Traditional Owners of the land on which we work and recognise their continued custodianship and connection to the land, waters and community. We pay our respects to them and their Elders past and present as our knowledge holders.
>