- From: Donal Fitzpatrick <donal.fitzpatrick@dcu.ie>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 12:57:15 +0100
- To: Daniel Montalvo <dmontalvo@w3.org>
- Cc: shadi+eosurvey@w3.org, wai-eo-editors@w3.org
Many thanks Daniel, duly noted. > On 26 Jun 2020, at 11:49, Daniel Montalvo <dmontalvo@w3.org> wrote: > > Hey Donal, > > Thank you very much for your feedback. > > Please note that I have open three separate issues based on comments you provided in the survey (email below). You can see all three at > https://github.com/w3c/wai-curricula/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+donal > > You are welcome to continue the discussion > * via email > * commenting on the issues that I opened > * opening new issues if you feel I did not cover your input or comments properly. > > Thanks. > > > -- > > Daniel Montalvo > > Accessibility Education and Training Specialist > W3C/WAI > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: "Dónal Fitzpatrick" via WBS Mailer <sysbot+wbs@w3.org> >> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 6:27 PM >> To: dmontalvo@w3.org; shadi+eosurvey@w3.org >> Subject: [wbs] response to 'WAI Curricula Starfish review for Modules 1, 2, and 3 of curriculum Developing Accessible Content' >> >> The following answers have been successfully submitted to 'WAI Curricula Starfish review for Modules 1, 2, and 3 of curriculum Developing >> Accessible Content' (Education and Outreach Working Group) for Dónal Fitzpatrick. >> >>> >>> --------------------------------- >>> Review level >>> >>> ---- >>> What level of review did you do? >>> >>> >> >> * (x) I thoroughly reviewed the materials. >> * ( ) I skimmed them. >> * ( ) I need more time and will review by the date provided below. >> * ( ) I didn't get to it and will not in the near future. I abstain from providing comment. >> >> >> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------- >>> Module 1: Page Structure >>> >>> ---- >>> Please focus on Module 1: Page Structure >>> * Are all points covered - is anything missing? >>> * Is there anything in there that should not be in there? >>> * Do you agree with the overall topic structure? >>> Please focus on Learning outcomes for module 1 and contrast them with >>> the learning outcomes for each of the topics in the module. Do you >>> think they fit well together? >>> You can comment below or leave a GitHub Issue about Page Structure >>> >> Comments: >> This module generally covers the material required for an introductory-level course in which page structure, and associated issues are the >> primary topic. Learning outcomes seem good, with the following >> caveats: >> >> 1. In the section "Topic: Page Regions" I have the following remarks: >> A) the learning outcome entitled "Describe strategies to interact with and move to different regions of a web page" is very heavily focussed >> on those who interact using screen readers. No reference is made to, for example, voice navigation, switch control, or magnification. >> B) the remaining outcomes seem to be well-aligned with the overall learning outcomes of the module. >> >> In the suggested topics, there is again an emphasis on screen readers with little-to-no mention of other assistive technologies. I would >> recommend reviewing to ensure that this bias is somewhat reduced. >> >> 2. In the section: "topic: Headings" I have the following remarks: >> A) the first learning outcome is again almost exclusively focussed on screen readers and does not take note of other Assistive Technologies. >> In the second learning outcome, I would recommend adding some text to the effect that the student should also become familiar with the >> occasions when it is appropriate to use h1-h6, and when to use the ARIA role. This is a crucial competency in my view as the ARIA role is >> frequently misused and this juncture represents an ideal opportunity for its inclusion. >> 3. Topic entitled "Topic: Page Contents" seems wel aligned to overall outcomes. >> 4. the section entitled "Topic: Meta Information" seems solid and I have no issues at this time. >> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------- >>> Module 2: Navigation and Menus >>> >>> ---- >>> Please focus on Module 2: Navigation and Menus. >>> * Are all points covered - is anything missing? >>> * Is there anything in there that should not be in there? >>> * Do you agree with the overall topic structure?Please focus on >>> Learning outcomes for module 2 and contrast them with the learning >>> outcomes for each of the topics in the module. Do you think they fit well together? >>> You can comment below or leave a GitHub Issue about Navigation and >>> Menus >>> >> Comments: >> I generally found this module to be well-defined. Some general comments: >> >> 1. I feel that the ordering of the mechanisms for navigation across websites, as expressed in LO1 of the topic "Topic: Multiple Ways of >> Navigation" might warrant examination and reordering. >> 2. In the section entitled "Topic: Static Navigational Mechanisms", references to headings and nav elements are present yet no mention is >> made of lists and list-items. These are also important to the creation of navigational structures across websites. Whilst this is to be found >> in LO2, I think that both of these learning outcomes could be examined with a view to either amalgamation or rewording. >> >> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------- >>> Module 3: Images and Graphics >>> >>> ---- >>> Please focus on Module 3: Images and Graphics >>> * Are all points covered - is anything missing? >>> * Is there anything in there that should not be in there? >>> * Do you agree with the overall topic structure?Please focus on >>> Learning outcomes for module 3 and contrast them with the learning >>> outcomes for each of the topics in the module. Do you think they fit well together? >>> You can comment below or leave a GitHub Issue about Images and >>> Graphics >>> >> Comments: >> I found this module to be well written. I noted that, in the case of some of the learning outcomes, the focus was not exclusively devoted to >> the screen reader but also included examples (voice etc.). this approach could and should be considered for Modules 1 and 2. >> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------- >>> Additional comments >>> >>> ---- >>> Use the space below to include any additional observations or concerns >>> you would like to see addressed at this stage. >>> >> Additional Comments: >> >> >>> >>> These answers were last modified on 22 June 2020 at 16:25:25 U.T.C. >>> by Dónal Fitzpatrick >>> >> Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35532/wai-curricula-starfish-review-123/ >> until 2020-06-22. >> >> Regards, >> >> The Automatic WBS Mailer > > -- * *Séanadh Ríomhphoist/Email Disclaimer* *Tá an ríomhphost seo agus aon chomhad a sheoltar leis faoi rún agus is lena úsáid ag an seolaí agus sin amháin é. Is féidir tuilleadh a léamh anseo. <https://sites.google.com/view/seanadh-riomhphoist>* *This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for use by the addressee. Read more here. <https://sites.google.com/view/dcu-email-disclaimer>* * -- <https://www.facebook.com/DCU/> <https://twitter.com/DublinCityUni> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/dublin-city-university> <https://www.instagram.com/dublincityuniversity/?hl=en> <https://www.youtube.com/user/DublinCityUniversity>
Received on Friday, 26 June 2020 11:57:31 UTC