- From: Hidde de Vries <hidde@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 12:50:50 +0200
- To: kakinney@ets.org
- Cc: wai-eo-editors <wai-eo-editors@w3.org>
Hello Kris Anne, > I don't feel that I know enough about the ATAG success criteria to comment > if the names reflect accuracy. But I think the list that you have makes > sense and would make sense to people with basic knowledge. Thanks, this is great feedback. I will have it checked by ATAG experts for accuracy. > I think it's perfectly acceptable to ask for clarification if someone says > "partially". Great! > Also, if they say no (and maybe even Not Sure), do we ask > if they plan to update or fix it so that it does conform to ATAG. I wasn't planning on asking that, but it's an interesting suggestion. On the one hand I would be very interested to know, it may even give insight in how well our efforts to raise the profile of ATAG are working. On the other hand… are we the right party/project to collect that info about individual vendor's progress? Curious to hear how others think about it, let's discuss on Friday. Thanks, Hidde
Received on Wednesday, 25 September 2019 10:50:54 UTC