Re: [wbs] response to 'WAI Curricula: Introduction to Web Accessibility - Butterfly Approval (Approval to Publish)'

On 11/26/2019 8:45 PM, Jennifer Chadwick via WBS Mailer wrote:
> The following answers have been successfully submitted to 'WAI Curricula:
> Introduction to Web Accessibility - Butterfly Approval (Approval to
> Publish)' (Education and Outreach Working Group) for Jennifer Chadwick.
>
>> ---------------------------------
>> About this survey
>>
>> ----
>> We would like to publish the first iteration of the curricula for UN IDPD
>> on 3 December. We will continue to refine it. The Editor, Project
>> Manager, Co-Chairs, and Team Contact are all committed to addressing
>> important issues promptly over the coming days and weeks.
>>
>> This survey form collects responses to the EOWG publication approval of
>> the WAI Curricula's first module, Introduction to Web Accessibility.
>>   * WAI Curricula final draft for approval (resource landing page and
>> first curriculum)
>>   * Diff | changelog shows changes since the monkey review version of
>> September 2019
>> Note: Please do not include in this survey copy edits, typos,
>> punctuation, etc. that do not need Working Group review; instead, please
>> make copy edits and such directly in Github (fork, edit, pull request)
>> (or e-mail them to:wai-eo-editors@w3.org).
>>
>> For each of your comments, please clearly indicate:
>>   * level either:
>>       * [ED-low] = editors' discretion before or after first iteration
>> published, or
>>         * [ED-med] = editors' discretion before or after first iteration
>> published, or
>>         * [!!] =  important to be addressed before first iteration
>> publication
>>         * (do this for comments in GitHub, too)
>>      
>>   * location: (such as: "page: Image Maps. under Introduction heading,
>> third paragraph")
>>   * current wording:
>>   * suggested revision:
>>   * rationale:
>>
>>
>   
> [ED-low]
> location: page: Curricula on Web Accessibility under heading "Future
> Outline" for each of the roles, the bullet points under the "Intermediate"
> and "Advanced" sections.
> current wording:  no specific wording but all bullet points assigned to
> each role. Where does these come from?
> suggested revision:  Are these aligned with the ARRM Roles and
> Responsibilities Mapping?
> https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/ARRM_Project_-_Accessibility_Roles_and_Responsibilities_Mapping
> rationale: It may be helpful to have consistent roles and tasks assigned in
> the various W3C resource documentation.  If this is not helpful, happy to
> discuss or understand.  Thanks!


The bullets under intermediate and advanced are ideas for future 
curricula. Not specifically tasks associated to each of the roles, but 
possible titles for modules addressing each of them specifically.


Yes, they are aligned with ARRM, as it is stated in the requirements 
analysis at 
https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/WAI_Curricula#Potential_Roles_to_Address.


It is true that the terms we use (Developer, Designer, Author, Tester, 
and Manager) are not exactly those used in the Role definition document. 
Do you think these terms need to be exactly the same as those found in ARRM?


If so,

what we have now -> may become:

Developers -> Implementation Role Groups

Designer -> Design Role Groups

Authors -> Content Authoring

Managers -> Management Roles

Testers -> Testing Roles


If you think it helps, we could research how to update this table in 
future iterations, especially as we start developing more curricula.


>> ---------------------------------
>> Review level
>>
>> ----
>>
>>
>>
>   * [x] I reviewed it thoroughly.
>   * [ ] I skimmed it.
>   * [ ] I didn't get to it. (Please do answer the next question, too!)
> Comments:
> I really like that accessibility, inclusion and usability are defined
> separately and this explored and explained.
> I also like that one of the learning outcomes for students is that they
> should research organizations and their practices that are demonstrating
> accessibility and inclusion.
>
>> ---------------------------------
>> Comments and publication approval
>>
>> ----
>>
>>
>>
>   * [ ] I support publishing these WAI Curricula pages as they are
>   * [x] I support publishing these WAI Curricula pages; please consider [ED]
> comments in GitHub (or below) for editors' discretion.
>   * [ ] I support publishing these WAI Curricula pages only with the changes
> in [!!] comments in GitHub  (or below)
>   * [ ] I do not support publishing these WAI Curricula pages, because of
> the [!!] comments in GitHub  (or below)
>   * [ ] I abstain (not vote) and accept the decisions of the Working Group
> Comments:
>
>
>> These answers were last modified on 26 November 2019 at 19:43:52 U.T.C.
>> by Jennifer Chadwick
>>
> Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35532/curriculaBFR/  until 2019-11-26.
>
>   Regards,
>
>   The Automatic WBS Mailer
>

Received on Wednesday, 27 November 2019 16:39:12 UTC