- From: Eric Eggert <ee@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 21:09:11 +0200
- To: "Bakken, Brent" <brent.bakken@pearson.com>
- Cc: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>, wai-eo-editors <wai-eo-editors@w3.org>
+1 However, I have a minor quibble with the wording: On 10 May 2019, at 19:21, Bakken, Brent wrote: > Dear EOWG Participants, > > EOWG previously approved Shadi's updates to the Accessibility > Principles > page for WCAG 2.1 [1]. Based on input from the Low Vision Task Force, > we > have a change for you to review. In this section: > > https://deploy-preview-6--wai-accessibility-principles.netlify.com/fundamentals/accessibility-principles/#distinguishable > > > > Previously Approved Was: > * Text is resizable up to 200% without losing information, using a > standard > browser > * Text spacing can be adjusted without losing information, and reflows > on > small screens > > Changed to: > * When users resize text up to 400% or change text spacing, no > information > is lost This sounds like a requirement for text-only resizing. I think, while more indirect, “Text is resizable to 400%” is more precise to the SC. (But I like the new wording better :-D, so this should not be a show-stopper.) > * Text reflows in small windows or when users make the text larger > > *To respond, please reply only to <wai-eo-editors@w3.org > <wai-eo-editors@w3.org>> with +1 and/or other comments.* > > We hope to publish this on Wednesday to announce it for GAAD on > Thursday. > > Thanks! > ~ Sharron, Brent, Shawn > > [1] April survey results: > https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35532/AccPrin/results > > > Brent A. Bakken > Director, Accessibility Strategy & Education Services > Psychometrics & Testing Services > Co-Chair Pearson Able > *Pearson* > > 512 202 1087 > brent.bakken@pearson.com -- Eric Eggert Web Accessibility Specialist Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) at World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
Received on Friday, 10 May 2019 19:09:19 UTC