- From: Bakken, Brent <brent.bakken@pearson.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 10:21:43 -0500
- To: Sharron Rush <srush@knowbility.org>
- Cc: wai-eo-editors <wai-eo-editors@w3.org>, Sarah Pulis <sarah@intopia.digital>
- Message-ID: <CAE6qf-FHVdpnNzy2Tkb7eD+Zoibg1hAL26Eefb9DhLHgBeQqWQ@mail.gmail.com>
> > > *Specialist language* – Since this is a specialized filed, should we > include any guidance on how to reference disability, W3C process, > referencing materials or anything else that is super-specialized for our > environment? +1 specifically Brent A. Bakken Director, Accessibility Strategy & Education Services Pearson 512 202 1087 brent.bakken@pearson.com Learn more at pearson.com [image: Pearson] On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Sharron Rush <srush@knowbility.org> wrote: > I am thinking about how this will be presented and would like to suggest > this format. Sarah and Shawn, if you agree I will format the wiki to > reflect these sections: > > *Introduction* – What the guide is meant to do, how it will make our job > easier, and how to use it. > > *Voice* – Can we make a statement about what we want the quality of the > voice to be? I am thinking about some of the adjectives we used to describe > how we wanted the web site to be. Some words that will suggest rhythm, and > maybe a list of voice qualities to avoid. Each statement could then be > explained it in more detail and examples provided for how to put it into > practice > > *.Tone* – This seems a bit trickier and might entail how to use the voice > we agree on with different tones. There will be variation depending on > different scenarios, do you agree? This may be a place to reference our > personas. > > *Style* – After introducing the guide and setting voice and tone, that's > when I think we get into the style guide items that Shawn and Annabelle > started and Sarah expanded on. > > *Specialist language* – Since this is a specialized filed, should we > include any guidance on how to reference disability, W3C process, > referencing materials or anything else that is super-specialized for our > environment? > > Throughout I strongly believe that we should use as many examples as > possible and be specific to our own stuff, as the first set of guides has > done. Is this an approach we can agree on? or have I overlooked or > misunderstood any of it? This is new to me so don't hesitate to let me > know. > > Thanks, > Sharron > > -- > Sharron Rush | Executive Director | Knowbility.org | @knowbility > *Equal access to technology for people with disabilities* >
Received on Friday, 30 June 2017 15:22:16 UTC