Re: [wbs] response to 'EOWG Weekly Survey - 21 August 2015'

HI Jon,

Thanks for this. I think I have picked everything up from the wiki. If there is something that I have missed, please do tell me.

Thanks

Kevin

> On 4 Sep 2015, at 13:50, Jon Metz <metzessible@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Kevin,
> 
> I see that the below Survey that was emailed to me was actually not
> populated at all. Iıve just gone and added everything to the Survey. Iıll
> double check, but my actual comments should be either on the Wiki or the
> individual Github questions.
> 
> It looks like the last two questions did in fact get answered though.
> 
> Thanks for the late ad, and sorry for only just now noticing this.
> 
> Jon
> 
> On 8/31/15, 12:18 PM, "Jonathan Metz via WBS Mailer" <sysbot+wbs@w3.org>
> wrote:
> 
>> The following answers have been successfully submitted to 'EOWG Weekly
>> Survey - 21 August 2015' (Education and Outreach Working Group) for
>> Jonathan
>> Metz.
>> 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------
>>> Resolutions of 21 August
>>> ----
>>> Please read the 21 August Minutes for EOWG Teleconference and indicate
>>> your approval or concerns with the resolutions passed at that meeting.
>>> (In order to have the records in one place, please also indicate that
>>> you
>>> have read the minutes in the usual Minutes wiki page.)
>>> 
>> 
>> * (X ) I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
>> * ( ) I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed.
>> * ( ) I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns with the Resolutions,
>> and I explain them below.
>> * ( ) I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my
>> review
>> into the comments box.
>> Comments: 
>> **Can you add me to the Present section as having been there? Iım not
>> listed anywhere!
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------
>>> Tips - Changes for review
>>> ----
>>> We made the following changes to the Tips pages last week:
>>> 
>>> *  Developing Tips - Mark-Up tip - Swapped order of mark-up tip
>>> examples, changed caption on what is now first example.
>>> 
>>> *  Developing Tips - Code Order Tip - changed color of sneaker and
>>> order
>>> of labels.
>>> 
>>> *  Developing Tips - Meaning for Interactive Elements - changed color
>>> of
>>> switch.
>>> 
>>> *  Developing Tips - Avoid Mistakes Tip -  removed date field example
>>> 
>>> 
>>> *  Developing Tips - Avoid Mistakes Tip - Changed example to Australian
>>> phone number with simpler instruction.
>>> 
>>> *  Writing Tips - Avoid Mistakes Tip - Simplified and focused example
>>> by
>>> removing everything except password instruction.
>>> 
>>> *  Writing Tips - Headings Tip - Improved modal window management.
>>> 
>>> To comment on any of the changes, please comment in the GitHub thread
>>> (or
>>> comment in this survey, or raise a new issue in GitHub).
>>> 
>> 
>> * ( ) I'm OK with these changes.
>> * (X ) I put comments in GitHub.
>> * ( ) I put comments below.
>> * ( ) I have not gotten to this yet, and will do it by: [put in the
>> Comment field the date by which you will get to it]
>> * ( ) I'm not going to be able to get to this, and I will pass on
>> commenting on it.
>> Comments: 
>> I made a comment in Issue 153. I also donıt know how to reopen something
>> in Github.
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------
>>> Developing Tips - CAPTCHA
>>> ----
>>> Discussion of the CAPTCHA tip is available in:
>>> * GitHub CAPTCHA issue #159
>>> * 14 August meeting minutes
>>> * 21 August meeting minutes
>>> Please review the background and see the latest draft CAPTCHA Tip. Then
>>> indicate below your level of satisfaction with the current version, and
>>> any comments.
>>> 
>> 
>> * ( ) I approve of how the issue has been addressed and have no
>> significant concerns (other than minor wordsmithing).
>> * ( ) I have concerns and put comments in GitHub.
>> * ( ) I have concerns and put comments below or in email to the EOWG
>> list.
>> * ( ) I cannot get to this yet, and have put the date for my review into
>> the comments box.
>> * (X ) I'm not going to be able to get to this, I will pass on commenting
>> on it, and go with the decision of the Group.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------
>>> Tips - Label for Understanding WCAG links in Learn More
>>> ----
>>> Please read the wiki page about Category name [Label] for Understanding
>>> links. Include your comments in that wiki page. Also please list the
>>> labels that you like best in the survey here.
>>> 
>> 
>> * (X ) I have reviewed the issue and added my comments in the wiki.
>> * ( ) I have reviewed the issue and I have no comments to add; I'll go
>> with the decision of the Group.
>> * ( ) I have not gotten to this yet, and will do it by: [put in the
>> Comment field the date by which you will get to it]
>> * ( ) I'm not going to be able to get to this, I will pass on commenting
>> on it, and go with the decision of the Group.
>> Preferred label(s):
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------
>>> Tips - Design of Examples
>>> ----
>>> Please read the wiki page about Styling of Examples. Include your
>>> comments in that wiki page. Also please list which Alternatives you like
>>> best in the survey here.
>>> 
>> 
>> * ( ) I have reviewed the alternatives and added my comments in the wiki.
>> * (x) I have reviewed the alternatives and I have no comments to add;
>> I'll
>> go with the decision of the Group.
>> * ( ) I have not gotten to this yet, and will do it by: [put in the
>> Comment field the date by which you will get to it]
>> * ( ) I'm not going to be able to get to this, I will pass on commenting
>> on it, and go with the decision of the Group
>> Preferred Alternative(s):
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------
>>> Tips on Writing for Web Accessibility - Thorough Review
>>> ----
>>> Please read carefully and thoroughly the Tips on Writing for Web
>>> Accessibility. This is our last review before final approval for
>>> publication. 
>>> Note related to the "Keep content clear and concise" tip:
>>> * The last bullet was edited based on input during and after the 21
>>> August telecon, and there is an open GitHub issue 180 if you want to
>>> comment on it.
>>> * The example is being updated, and we'll ask for review of that
>>> example
>>> later.
>>> 
>>> With those exceptions, please post any additional comments as a new
>>> GitHub issue. (If you're not comfortable with GitHub, please put
>>> comments
>>> in this survey.)
>>> 
>>> Also, if you raise a new issue, please indicate if your feelings about
>>> it
>>> are mild or strong.
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> * (x) I reviewed it thoroughly and put my comments in GitHub.
>> * ( ) I reviewed it thoroughly and put my comments below.
>> * ( ) I have not gotten to this yet, and have indicated below the date I
>> can do this review.
>> * ( ) I'm not going to be able to get to this at all, I will pass on
>> commenting on it for now and in the future, and go with the decisions of
>> the Group.
>> Comments: 
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> These answers were last modified on 31 August 2015 at 16:15:38 U.T.C.
>>> by Jonathan Metz
>>> 
>> Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at
>> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35532/EOWG-21Aug2015/ until 2015-09-01.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> The Automatic WBS Mailer
>> 
> 
> 
> 

Received on Friday, 4 September 2015 12:56:23 UTC