- From: Kevin White <kevin@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 09:16:48 +0100
- To: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Cc: LHarkey@suddenlink.net, wai-eo-editors <wai-eo-editors@w3.org>, "Bakken, Brent" <brent.bakken@pearson.com>
Hi Shadi, > On 8 Jul 2015, at 08:15, Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org> wrote: > >> Comments: >> Approach section: Casting for performers/actors/characters, etc may be a >> better description if there will be multiple characters in the video versus >> using the word 'protagonist', as protagonist suggest one person will be the >> lead or central figure. > > Thank you for these suggestions. > > Kevin had a similar comment. However, both "performers" and "actors" do not work, as we do not anticipate hiring performers or actors. I think the word "character" is most neutral, and allows for both options. > > Kevin, does the word "characters" address your concern as well? Being a little bit pedantic (sorry), ‘character’ is the role that a ‘performer’ plays. As I said, I am comfortable with whatever, my (slight) concern was only the subtle suggestion, implied in ‘protagonist’ that there was only one person involved. Thanks Kevin
Received on Wednesday, 8 July 2015 08:16:56 UTC