- From: Kevin White <kevin@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 16:06:12 +0100
- To: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
- Cc: wai-eo-editors <wai-eo-editors@w3.org>
Hi Michael, Thanks for the feedback. Kevin > On 6 Jul 2015, at 16:05, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org> wrote: > > I don't think I have anything specific. WCAG 2.0 neither requires nor forbids this. If using it, it would need to meet the requirements for color contrast, text size etc. I think a CSS technique or two mentions that. > > If you're looking for a "should do this" or "should not do this", that would be subject of a new technique. Arguments would need to be made for why this should be preferred or avoided. I personally think it would fall on the side of being encouraged but not required to be sufficient for WCAG, though maybe cognitive techniques or something would push harder in favor of it. > > Michael > > On 06/07/2015 10:27 AM, Kevin White wrote: >> Hi Michael, >> >> Hope all is well with you. There was a bit of a discussion in EO on Friday related to the value of providing alternative styling for :active links. Such as when they are touched or clicked. Do you have any pointers or information regarding this? >> >> Thanks >> >> Kevin > >
Received on Monday, 6 July 2015 15:06:25 UTC