- From: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 11:56:35 -0500
- To: Gregg Vanderheiden <gregg@raisingthefloor.org>
- CC: WCAG Editors <team-wcag-editors@w3.org>, wai-eo-editors <wai-eo-editors@w3.org>
[CC wai-eo-editors@w3.org -- a publicly-archived list] I think that would significantly water down the main point. If people feel strongly that we need to say something "to show that we are not biased in favor of our own technologies", perhaps it might work to add something in the middle saying it's true of WAI-ARIA, SVG, and other W3C and non-W3C technologies ? -- although I don't see that that is necessary and it does add complexity. Happy to talk through it more... ~Shawn On 4/30/2014 9:41 PM, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote: ... > When we do this — I think we should add to the end. “This is true > for all technologies, including HTML.” to show that we are not > biased in favor of our own technologies — and this IS VERY true of > HTML as well. > > > gregg > > On Apr 30, 2014, at 8:49 AM, Joshue O Connor > <gregg@raisingthefloor.org <mailto:gregg@raisingthefloor.org>> > wrote: > >> Hi Shawn, >> >> We would like invite the EO working group to come to a WCAG working >> group meeting shortly to satisfactorily address this comment. [1] >> >> The WCAG working group is on a tight publication schedule and would >> like to address it promptly. >> >> Please let us know a time that suits. >> >> [1] >> https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/WD-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20-20140107/2895 >> >> >> -- >> Joshue O Connor/Andrew Kirkpatrick WCAG working group co-chairs >> >> >
Received on Friday, 2 May 2014 16:56:44 UTC