- From: Andrew Arch <andrew@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 18:12:38 +0100
- To: Liam McGee <liam@communis.co.uk>, Michael Stenitzer <stenitzer@wienfluss.net>, Sylvie duchateau <sylvie.duchateau@snv.jussieu.fr>, Sharron Rush <srush@knowbility.org>, Heather Hasner <hhasner@gmail.com>
- CC: wai-eo-editors <wai-eo-editors@w3.org>
Hello Liam, Michael, Sylvie, Sharron and Heather, In EOWG on Friday it was suggested to ask a few participants who regularly engage in training to take a closer look at the draft 3-day example. This example is quite different from the earlier ones as it covers a multi-day time frame and has a variety of audiences at different times. It also has a different layout (not shown to EOWG last week) as recommend by the WAI-AGE task-force to reflect its less formal structure and place the emphasis on the outline framework rather than the resources. Could you please take a close look at this example [1] and, given the scenario, provide any comments on the sample outline (which is broken into sessions by target audience). In particular, is the material covered in the sample outline and the times allocated reasonable as an example of an in-house 3-day workshop? Feedback would be appreciated by 6 April, but let me know if you need any longer. Thanks, Andrew [1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/training/2009/scenarios.html#s7 -- Andrew Arch Web Accessibility and Ageing Specialist http://www.w3.org/People/Andrew/ http://www.w3.org/WAI/WAI-AGE/
Received on Tuesday, 30 March 2010 17:13:15 UTC