- From: Andrew Arch <andrew@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:47:13 +0100
- To: Jennifer Sutton <jsuttondc@gmail.com>
- CC: wai-eo-editors@w3.org
Hello Jennifer, Thanks for installments III and IV for the last 2 pages of the Training suite. I've integrated some of these too into the current drafts for EO review. Regards, Andrew Jennifer Sutton wrote: > EOWG Editors: > > Here are my nine comments on the fourth page of the Training Suite. > Jennifer > > IV. Example Outline for a Web Accessibility Workshop > http://www.w3.org/WAI/training/workshop-outlines.html > [Editor's draft in progress - updated 11 August 2010] > > 4.1. You might want to fix the uri. It's one workshop outline. > > 4.2. "A three-day hands-on workshop to inform [JS: add participants] > about web accessibility and to teach developers > > 4.3. Consider, in these links, whether "to attend" is necessary: > Day 1: Managers and decision makers to attend > Days 1 and 2: Web content authors and visual designers to attend > > 4.4. I think some content may be missing in the list item bracketed below: > > Describe the steps needed to develop organizational policies on web > accessibility > [Identify] > Describe the principles for selecting appropriate authoring and > evaluation tools > > 4.5. "Provision or [JS: change to of] > [link] consistent navigation > across a website > > 4.6. I think there's a space before the paren.: > Day 3 - Session 3: Basics of accessible scripting and WAI-ARIA > ( > Accessible Rich Internet Applications) > > 4.7. "Introduction to [JS: add the] concept of progressive enhancement > with scripting" > > 4.8. This is the first time I can remember seeing this site abbreviated > as "BAD;" It might be better to write it out, as is elsewhere, for > consistency: > > Carry out an activity or exercise, possibly based on the [link] BAD site > or the organization's site (or a similar or competitor's site), to > reinforce the > learning for some issues, with discussion of the solutions applied > > 4.9. I think this should be moved up. It gets lost at the end: > > Finish days 1 and 2 with a brief summary of the day; start days 2 and 3 > with a brief > summary of the previous day > > I think it belongs, perhaps, BEFORE this: > > "Additional notes for presenters for the technical sessions on days 2 > and 3:" > > >
Received on Friday, 20 August 2010 15:47:52 UTC