- From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:28:08 +0100
- To: Yeliz Yesilada <yesilady@cs.man.ac.uk>
- CC: wai-eo-editors@w3.org, public-bpwg <public-bpwg@w3.org>
Yeliz, comments below. Jo On 13/10/2008 22:01, Yeliz Yesilada wrote: > Hi Jo, > > Thanks for your comments. > > On 13 Oct 2008, at 10:13, Jo Rabin wrote: > >> >> Under Focus (tab) order - I think the mobile section sort of >> implies that navigation is via tab key, which it isn't, but in any >> case it may be worth mentioning that it's hard to navigate with the >> common 4-way rocker. >> >> >Please let me know what you think about the latest version of the >> description, I tried not to talk about any specific technology here. >> >> Sorry if this seems a bit picky, or unduly politically correct, but >> >> "Mobile Context: Pointing device not present or inadequate." >> >> I think that saying "inadequate" opens a number of questions which we >> don't want to go into here, so maybe we can just say "There may be no >> pointing device" > > > I understand your point. What about changing Mobile context to " Device > has no mouse, only alphanumeric keypad or joystick so user can use tab > navigation to move from one element to another". Do you think this will > solve the ambiguity in the definition? I think the main point is only that the device usually won't have a mouse. It may have a touch screen, it may just have a 10 key keypad, it might have a soft keyboard etc. so fwiw I don't think it is worth elaborating on what it may or may not have other than to note that there may not be a pointing device. > >> >> >Changed the description to "Some older mobile browsers do not display >> content with invalid markup. Additionally, content adaptation for >> mobile device agents is unpredictable and possibly incomplete if the >> page markup is invalid." >> >> I really think the second sentence (Additionally ...) asks more >> questions than it answers so it would be better if it was removed. > > OK, I will remove that. > > Please let me know what you think about the suggested change above so > that I can quickly change the document. > > Yeliz. >
Received on Tuesday, 14 October 2008 08:28:59 UTC