[wbs] response to 'EOWG Call for Review: WCAG 2.0 Presentation 1'

The following answers have been successfully submitted to 'EOWG Call for
Review: WCAG 2.0 Presentation 1' (Education and Outreach Working Group)
for Shawn Henry.



---------------------------------
Version
----
Which version are these comments for? The version date is on Slide 2.



 * (x) 27 August 2007





---------------------------------
Community or Public
----
First, a relatively easy question:The presentation talks about
"Community|Public review, comments, and feedback..." and "Providing
adequate time for community|public review," on Slide 8, Slide 9 Notes, and
Slide 11 Notes. Do you prefer "community" or "public" for these? Use the
comment field for any explanations.



 * (x) Prefer community
 * ( ) Prefer public
 * ( ) No preference

Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): 
only mildly. happy with either one.




---------------------------------
Example of WCAG 2.0 providing more design flexibility
----
Slide 28 has the following examples of how WCAG 2.0 provides more
flexibility for design:

 * WCAG 1.0 Checkpoint 7.1: Until user agents allow users to control
flickering, avoid causing the screen to flicker. [Priority 1]WCAG 2.0
allows more movement within defined parameters
 * WCAG 1.0 Checkpoint 13.6: Group related links, identify the group (for
user agents), and, until user agents do so, provide a way to bypass the
group. [Priority 3]WCAG 2.0 allows more flexibility in meeting the
corresponding success criteria: Bypass Blocks: A mechanism is available to
bypass blocks of content that are repeated on multiple Web pages


Are these good examples? Are they clear and strong? Please rate each from
the drop-down list.
What would be another clear, strong example? Please put it in the Comments
field.


 * Checkpoint 7.1 -- WCAG 2.0 allows more movement: [ No opinion ] 
 * Checkpoint 13.6 -- WCAG 2.0 lists more techniques : [ No opinion ] 

Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): 
{pass, as want to get the group's input :)




---------------------------------
Example of WCAG 1.0 user agent clause that's no longer an issue
----
For Slide 35 we want to give an example or two of things that were
required in WCAG 1.0 that are no longer issues due to developments in
technologies. Ideas:

 * 1.5 Until user agents render text equivalents for client-side image map
links, provide redundant text links for each active region of a client-side
image map.
 * 
10.4 Until user agents handle empty controls correctly, include default,
place-holding characters in edit boxes and text areas.
 * 
10.5 Until user agents (including assistive technologies) render adjacent
links distinctly, include non-link, printable characters (surrounded by
spaces) between adjacent links.



Are these good examples? Are they clear and strong? Please rate each from
the drop-down list.
What would be another clear, strong example? Please put it in the Comments
field.


 * 1.5 Until user agents render text equivalents for client-side image map
links...: [ No opinion ] 
 * 10.4 Until user agents handle empty controls correctly...: [ No opinion
] 
 * 10.5 Until user agents (including assistive technologies) render
adjacent links distinctly...: [ No opinion ] 

Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): 
{pass, as want to get the group's input :)




---------------------------------
Acceptance of WCAG 2.0 Presentation Directive Overview
----
Based on the current version, please answer below. Note that you can
change your answer; for example, if there are edits later.


 * ( ) I accept this version of the document as is
 * ( ) I accept this version of the document, and suggest changes below
 * ( ) I accept this version of the document only if the changes below are
implemented
 * ( ) I do not accept this version of the document because of the
comments below
 * ( ) I abstain (not vote)





---------------------------------
Comments
----
Comments on the document, formatted as described above.

Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): 



These answers were last modified on 29 August 2007 at 15:30:16 U.T.C.
by Shawn Henry

Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35532/wcag20pres-easy1/ until 2007-09-05.

 Regards,

 The Automatic WBS Mailer

Received on Wednesday, 29 August 2007 15:32:07 UTC