- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 15:27:29 -0500
- To: wai-eo-editors@w3.org
- Cc: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>, "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>
In "How WAI Develops Accessibility Guidelines through the W3C Process" I see... "The main purpose of the Last Call is to provide a complete document for thorough community review. After the Last Call comment period, it can take weeks or months for a Working Group to formally address all comments, document the resolutions, and make necessary changes. If there are substantive changes, the Working Group goes through another Last Call Working Draft before moving to the next stage." -- http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/w3c-process The main purpose of Last Call is to double-check that review is complete; i.e. to check that the result of integrating earlier comments is satisfactory. The text quoted above suggests that Last Call is a good time to _start_ reviewing a draft. I think that's a terribly counter-productive message to send. Please change it. Also, the "it can take weeks or months" text seems overly dramatic, given that there is nothing under "Working Draft" about turn-around time for comments. I suggest something like: (under Working Draft) Working Groups welcome public comments on Working Drafts and respond to them on a best-effort basis. While we try to respond to most comments within a week or two, conflicting input from multiple source may merit several weeks or months to reconcile. Comments received earlier in the process are usually easier for the Working Group to integrate, though there is a risk that the draft will change in later revisions. To be sure about how your comments are ultimately handled, double-check when Last Call is announced. Then change the Last Call item to: Last Call Working Draft: When a Working Group believes it has addressed all technical requirements, it announces a Last Call Working Draft. The main purpose of the Last Call is to provide a complete document so that reviewers can check that the result of integrating earlier comments is satisfactory. The Working Group is required by W3C process to address every issue raised in during the Last Call comment period; that is: to consider the issue, decide which changes to make, seek consensus with the reviewer, and document the ultimate disposition. Again, conflicting input from multiple source may merit several weeks or months to reconcile. If there are substantive changes, the Working Group goes through another Last Call Working Draft before moving to the next stage. You might also mention that last call includes a deadline for comments. I can't seem to find a succinct way to explain it. Perhaps leaving it out is just as well. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 5 September 2006 20:27:56 UTC