- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 19:39:54 +0200
- To: "EO comments" <wai-eo-editors@w3.org>
- Cc: "WAI EO group" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
I had a look at the document at http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/w3c-process I like the idea of an introduction, but I think it is important to give a bit more information about who can comment and what kid of comments are welcome - for example, editorial comments from the world are welcome at any stage, but at most transitions they may be held over, a last call draft has a stricter requirement than others for response to technical issues (both on the group and on teh commenter for any follow-up) and on a recommendation they can only be adopted in errata used to publish a new edition. Likewise, technical comments are not really welcome at all in PR stage, and effectively only member comments are invited. I also like the icons. But I don't like the alt text much. If they are going to be used again (and I actually suggest that it is a good idea in such a process-driven organisation) then I suggest you change the alt text to be the short form of the status label - "WD", "LC", etc - the things that people actually talk and write all the time. If you never use them again then they are really just decorative when combined with the existing text and I would recommend alt="". (This will help with things like making them more workable in mobiles and so on, too). Other than those comments, nice work... cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk chaals@opera.com Try Opera 9 now! http://opera.com
Received on Friday, 1 September 2006 17:40:26 UTC