Re: adding DRAFT back to BAD pages

done.


Shawn Henry wrote:
> Hi, Shadi,
> 
> Notes from our recent conversation:
> - We took [DRAFT] off the <h1>s while we were looking at heading/title 
> options, so as to get a better idea of length
> - It would be good to put [DRAFT] back so that it's clear when people 
> land there (as they are from WebAIM list) that the resources are still 
> in development
> - good to have [DRAFT] on <h1> of 
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2005/Demo/Overview & 
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2005/Demo/features (and 
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2005/Demo/report/, which it already is)
> - I think ok to have only in the footer of the Demo site pages 
> themselves (and not at the top or in an <h1>)
> 
> Best,
> ~ Shawn
> 
> 

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra     Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe |
Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG |
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)           http://www.w3.org/ |
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI),   http://www.w3.org/WAI/ |
WAI-TIES Project,                http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ |
Evaluation and Repair Tools WG,    http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ |
2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560,  Sophia-Antipolis - France |
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64          Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |

Received on Thursday, 30 November 2006 03:06:57 UTC