[wbs] response to 'EOWG Call for Review: Using Combined Expertise to Evaluate Web Accessibility'

Here are the answers submitted to 'EOWG Call for Review: Using Combined
Expertise to Evaluate Web Accessibility' (Education and Outreach Working
Group) for Henk Snetselaar.



---------------------------------
Using Combined Expertise to Evaluate Web Accessibility
----




 * ( ) I accept this version of the document as is
 * (x) I accept this version of the document, and suggest changes below
 * ( ) I accept this version of the document only with the changes below
 * ( ) I do not accept this version of the document because of the
comments below
 * ( ) I abstain (not vote)





---------------------------------
Comments
----
Comments on the document, formatted as described above.

Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): 
Hi Judy,

Pr. list for next verion
Location: Identification of external expertise
current wording:
As it comes to the evaluation of web sites I think our documents are most
of the time describing the situation in the USA, followed by some advise
on how to act or react in the described situation. E.g. the phrase in this
document: "Once gaps in internal expertise are clear, an organization can
prioritize its needs for external expertise. The internal gaps are often
in areas of knowledge specific to disability and/or accessibility" This
description considers the third party evaluation as somthing you can do
when eventually you can't manage it your self. But why not as a first
option?

Regards,
Henk


These answers were last modified on 13 March 2006 at 07:19:27 U.T.C.
by Henk Snetselaar

Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35532/expertise-2006/ until 2006-03-18.

 Regards,

 The Automatic WBS Mailer

Received on Monday, 13 March 2006 07:25:05 UTC