- From: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:28:27 -0500
- To: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Cc: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>, wai-eo-editors <wai-eo-editors@w3.org>
> Ref: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2005/Demo/after/template> Lookin good! > template". I've only made changes to that page so that we can compare > and refine it, before I role out onto all other pages. smart. > * reworded top banner to include clearer links *and* context information nice. Perhaps the following tweaks would increase readability and better match wording elsewhere: This is the Accessible Template Page of the BAD Demonstration. See: [ BAD Overview | Accessibility Barriers | Inaccessible Template Page] > * made the logo icon a link to the overview page (see questions below) haven't had a chance to think about that yet. > * removed the *dummy copyright* info with something fictional and non-legal like it. > * reworded the footer information and made link to footer of the overview > * added some background about the demonstration and linked to the overview Overall, much better. Suggest changing "... described in the overview." to "... described in Before and After Demonstration: Overview." or "... described in the BAD Overview." Now that it's not so "obnoxious", I think it might be smoother just to include the whole copyright notice, rather than pointing to it. > * reduced the default font-size on the footer to make it less obnoxious *Much* nicer... although, I think the color contrast might not be sufficient -- it's a bit hard for me even. Possibly making bold would do the trick? Or, might need a lighter color down there. > Besides feedback on the text of these two banners, I am still unclear > about what to do with the logo icon and would love some feedback. > Specifically: > * should the logo icon be a link, and where would it then go? > * is the image of the logo icon confusing and how/why so? Sorry, can't spend anymore time on this now. :-( Best, ~ Shawn
Received on Monday, 31 July 2006 16:28:32 UTC