- From: Andrew Arch <andrew.arch@nils.org.au>
- Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 00:34:33 +1000
- To: <wai-eo-editors@w3.org>
- Cc: "Shawn Lawton Henry \(E-mail\)" <shawn@w3.org>
Hi Shawn, All pretty damm good now. Well done :-) Just a comment/question re clarity of reading. In the RHS the links and the non-linked text has the same visual appearance - potentially breaking Checkpoint 2.1. I don't have an immediate suggestion, other than underlining the links which may look ugly. What about a different shade of rust or blue for linked and non-linked words? Andrew _________________________________ Dr Andrew Arch Manager Online Accessibility Consulting Accessible Information Solutions, NILS Ph 613 9864 9222; Fax 613 9864 9210; Mobile 0438 755 565 http://www.nils.org.au/ | http://www.it-test.com.au/ | http://www.ozewai.org/ Member, Education & Outreach Working Group, W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/ National Information & Library Service, Australia A subsidiary of RBS.RVIB.VAF Ltd.
Received on Friday, 15 October 2004 14:36:34 UTC