- From: <Andrew.Arch@visionaustralia.org.au>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:52:08 +1100
- To: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
- Cc: wai-eo-editors@w3.org
Some additional points that we include in our "selling" of accessibility in Australia (with comment from Shawn [SLH] and sometimes an additional comment from me [AA]) Andrew _________________________________ Dr Andrew Arch Manager Online Accessibility Consulting National Information & Library Service, Australia Ph 613 9864 9222; Fax 613 9864 9210; Mobile 0438 755 565 http://www.nils.org.au/ | http://www.it-test.com.au/ | http://www.ozewai.org/ Member, Education & Outreach Working Group, W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/ NILS - A Joint Venture between the Royal Victorian Institute for the Blind, The Royal Blind Society of NSW, and Vision Australia Foundation. ----- Forwarded by Andrew Arch/Kooyong/AFTB on 30/01/2004 01:10 PM ----- "Shawn Lawton Henry" To: <Andrew.Arch@visionaustralia.org.au> <shawn@w3.org> cc: Subject: RE: bcase-social factors for 23 January 2004 teleconference 30/01/2004 09:07 AM Hi, Andrew, Below are very quick replies. Do you want to send to the EOWG list any that you think we should discuss for Social Factors. And send to eo-editors those for the Technical & Financial Factors. cheers, ~ shawn > From: Andrew.Arch@nils.org.au [mailto:Andrew.Arch@nils.org.au] > Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 9:45 AM > To: shawn@w3.org > Cc: Judy Brewer > Subject: Re: bcase-social factors for 23 January 2004 teleconference > > > > Hi Shawn, > > The following is based on the list (slide) we talk to when > talking about who benefits from accessible design: > > # New users / Casual users (don't understand things like > new/multiple windows and non-underlined [unclear] links) SLH: a bit of a stretch; however, does fall under digital divide... perhaps should discuss briefly with EOWG AA: not so much the digital divide, but rather these folk benefit from all the good usability stuff that comprises a significant part of WCAG (including things like 'clear links') > # People with 'non-standard' equipment (eg PDAs, WAP, Macs) SLH: not a really a social issue, I think, should be covered in technical factors and referred to from financial factors > # People in restricted access environments (often corporate > situations with locked-down desktops) SLH: not a social issue. could be covered in technical or financial > # People with temporary impairments (eg from accidents, disease) SLH: not really a social group per se, how about covering in financial factors AA: but don't these folk fall into the same category as many elderly? Many of theme are actually disabled for a period of time (although they will recover). E.g. broken arms/legs, temporary sight impairment or blindness, stroke, etc. in Australia this has been estimated as a signiicant, if changing, group in the population and as high as 15% of the population according to some estimates. > # People who are coping with environmental distractions (eg > noise/light) SLH: not really a social group per se, perhaps worth mentioning in financial factors under increased use > You may want to consider expanding the current "groups" list > or the Scope list. I would especially like to see 'people > with temporary impairments' included - estimates in Australia > indicate that this group may be at least 10% of population at > any one point in time. SLH: not really a social group per se, how about covering in financial factors. could add one sentence that other situations/groups are addressed in financial & technical factors AA: if we move issues/groups to these sectiuon, then fine > > Andrew > _________________________________ > Dr Andrew Arch > Manager Online Accessibility Consulting > National Information & Library Service, Australia > Ph 613 9864 9222; Fax 613 9864 9210; Mobile 0438 755 565 > http://www.nils.org.au/ | http://www.it-test.com.au/ | > http://www.ozewai.org/ > > Member, Education & Outreach Working Group, > W3C Web Accessibility Initiative > http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/ > > NILS - A Joint Venture between the > Royal Victorian Institute for the Blind, The Royal Blind > Society of NSW, and Vision Australia Foundation. > > > > > > "Shawn Lawton > > Henry" To: > "'EOWG (E-mail)'" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org> > <shawn@w3.org> cc: > > Sent by: Subject: > bcase-social factors for 23 January 2004 teleconference > w3c-wai-eo-reques > > t@w3.org > > > > > > 23/01/2004 03:36 > > PM > > > > > > > > > > > > An agenda for our 23 January 2004 teleconference follows. > ... > > 3. Presenting the Case for Web Accessibility: Social Factors > > - see review notes in separate e-mail > > > NOTE: The only section that has significant changes since the > last review is the "Web Accessibility Benefits More Than > People with Disabilities" section at: > http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/bcase/soc.html#groups > > lastest draft: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/bcase/soc.html > - previous version: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/bcase/soc-old.html > - version before last major rewrite (from March 2003): > > http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/bcas> e/soc-old.html > > changelog > showing which changes are still > pending from last discussion: > - http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/bcase/changelog.html#changes > > > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 29 January 2004 23:54:09 UTC